• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Arizona Judge: Sportsbooks Can Go Live Thursday As Planned

Yavapai-Prescott Tribe asked for injunction, calling new law unconstitutional

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
September 7, 2021
in Legal, Regulation
Arizona-Flag-Waving-Monuments

(Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Monday night, an Arizona judge ruled against the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe, which was seeking to delay the start of the legal event wagering and have the state’s new gaming law declared unconstitutional. The ruling means that a planned Sept. 9 launch of sports betting can go forward, though it’s possible the tribe could appeal to another court.

1
BetMGM Sportsbook

Up To $1500 in Bonus Bets

4.5
Read Review
  • Promo Code: HANDLE
  • Up to $1,000 in Back if Your First Bet Doesn't Win
  • Offer Paid in Bonus Bets
  • 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
FanDuel Sportsbook

Get a No Sweat First Bet up to $2,500!

4.8
Read Review
  • No Promo Code Required
  • Tons of Props on 16+ Sports
  • 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
Betfred Sportsbook

Bet $50, Get Up to $1,111 in Fred Bets

3.8
Read Review
  • Promo Code: HANDLE
  • Solid Welcome Offer
  • 21+. Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge James Smith heard arguments for an hour Monday morning before rendering his opinion later in the day. Most major operators in the state — including BetMGM, Caesars, DraftKings, FanDuel, Penn National Gaming/Barstool Sports, and Rush Street Interactive/BetRivers — have plans to go live as early as 12:01 a.m. Thursday. All six are partnered with professional sports teams/franchises. Bally’s, partnered with the WNBA Phoenix Mercury, declined to reveal its launch date to Sports Handle.

In his ruling, Smith rejected arguments surrounding the Voter Protection Act (Proposition 202), which the tribe argued had been violated by the new law, and also wrote that the tribe should have acted sooner to seek legal remedy, rather than filing just one day before the Arizona Department of Gaming issued licenses and more than four months after lawmakers legalized event wagering.

“The tribe’s delay filing suit rebuts the notion of irreparable harm,” Smith wrote.

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

Compact expands gaming; tribe did not sign

The Yavapai-Prescott Tribe, which is located about 100 miles north of Phoenix, did not join myriad other Arizona tribes in renegotiating its compact this year. The new compact expands gaming to not only include event wagering, but allow for additional table games, including baccarat, craps, and roulette. The tribe said that it was shut out of the event-wagering application process and expansion because it did not sign a new compact. The state said the tribe was contacted during the compacting process.

By not signing the new compacts, the Yavapai-Prescott tribe not only missed its chance to apply for a mobile sportsbook license, but also isn't part of the updated compact allowing for craps, baccarat, roulette.

— Ryan Randazzo (@utilityreporter) September 7, 2021

One argument that Smith did not totally reject is the idea that tribes are at a disadvantage with regard to the ability to get a license. Arizona’s new law allows for 20 event wagering operator licenses, with 10 earmarked for tribes and 10 for professional sports teams/franchises. The tribe argued that everyone in Indian Country had about a 50% chance of getting a license — there are 20+ gaming tribes in the state — while commercial entities had a nearly 100% chance. The ADG got 16 applications from tribes and 10 from commercial entities. It awarded 10 licenses to tribes and eight to teams/franchises.

Smith suggested that the argument could have merit going forward, but that in its current form did not meet the requirements for him to issue an injunction.

During Monday’s hearing, which was held virtually and included representatives from the tribe, Gov. Doug Ducey’s office, and the ADG, Anni Foster on behalf of Ducey said the Yavapai-Prescott Tribe was asking to “turn back the clock” and “get a do over.” She argued that the tribe failed to show that it will suffer “irreparable damage, must demonstrate that hardship favors them, and that public policy favors the injunction … and they have not.” She went on to say that the tribe “conflated their angst with smoke and mirrors” and that their arguments are “hollow in relation to their claims.”

Tribal counsel argued that beyond the financial damage allowing expanded gaming will do in terms of taking business away from its brick-and-mortar location, that it is prohibited from purchasing tribal “trust land” in the Phoenix metro area, and therefore cannot increase its footprint.

“There is lot of difference in treatment” among the tribes and teams, and that is “very, very concerning,” tribal counsel said.

But Smith was not convinced, and the state got a victory.

“Today’s ruling is not just a win in court, but a win for Arizona,” C.J. Karamargin, Ducey’s communications director, said in a statement. “A tremendous amount of work by a diverse group of stakeholders has gone in to implementing HB2772 and the amended tribal-state gaming compacts. This ruling means that work will be allowed to continue.”

Breakdown of judge’s ruling

Here’s a look at Smith’s responses to four of the tribe’s arguments:

Argument: HB 2772, the bill that became the new sports betting law, was improperly treated as an emergency measure.

Smith’s response: “The Court doesn’t second-guess the Legislature’s emergency designation under the Constitution.”

Argument: HB 2772 impermissibly amended Proposition 202. If that is true, then HB 2777 violates the Voter Protection Act.

Smith’s response: “Plaintiff did not cite language from the Proposition indicating that Arizona would never expand gambling to different activities or locations … In fact, Proposition 202 mentioned a narrow scope … and contemplated gambling expansions.”

Argument: The Arizona constitution prohibits laws giving special privileges to small groups when a general law will accomplish the same thing. The Yavapai-Prescott argued HB 2772 violates the constitution.

Smith’s response: The judge wrote that according to a prior case, “the courts ‘defer to the legislature’s assessment that there is a problem to be solved and its policy choice as to how to resolve it.'” Smith contended that the argument does not meet the criteria based on a prior case.

Argument: The tribe argued that the court must use “strict scrutiny” to evaluate the law.

Smith’s response: The court said the tribes are “quasi-sovereign nations” and that the new law deals with “inter-governmental relationships,” and does not categorize the tribes as “individuals” based on race, religion, or ethnicity.

Smith went on to refer to Winter v. Nat Res. Def. Council, Inc., which states that “a preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as a right.”

In a preliminary hearing last Friday, Smith set the injunction hearing for Monday with the idea that he believed that the losing party would appeal, but as of Monday night, the Yavapai-Prescott had not publicly indicated whether it would do so.

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

austin-texas-capitol-building
Analysis

Here Are All The Reasons Texas Won’t Legalize Wagering This Year

April 3, 2023
oklahoma-city-sign-train-skyline
Legislation

Oklahoma Betting Bill That Would Put Tribes In Charge Passes House

March 23, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

colts logo

Source: ‘Pervasive’ Wagering From Colts Player Includes Bets On His Own Team

June 5, 2023
paspa ruling

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
inside-fanatics-sportsbook-fedex-field

Sources: Fanatics Enters Advanced Talks With PointsBet On Transformative U.S. Deal

May 12, 2023
new york times headquarters

The ‘Risky Wager’ Series From New York Times Was No Hit Piece — It’s Reality

May 31, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
May 16, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
May 2, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
April 24, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
May 3, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News