• About
  • Contact
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Bill Tracker
    • Arizona
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Georgia
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Mississippi
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • West Virginia
  • MI
  • VA
  • NJ
  • PA
  • TN
  • IN
  • CO
  • Betting Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Bill Tracker
    • Arizona
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Georgia
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Mississippi
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • West Virginia
  • MI
  • VA
  • NJ
  • PA
  • TN
  • IN
  • CO
  • Betting Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

CA Tribes Not Giving Up On Their Version Of Sports Betting

Group sues state for extension to collect signatures for ballot initiative as lawmakers consider own option

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
June 15, 2020
in Regulation
california-tribal-referendum

(Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A coalition of California Indian tribes was remarkably close to the threshold of signatures needed to get its sports betting referendum on the November ballot when Gov. Gavin Newsom put the state on lockdown to battle the spread of COVID-19 on March 20. And now the tribes are suing for the right to finishing collecting those signatures — for the 2022 ballot.

In a lawsuit filed June 9 in Superior Court of the State of California in Sacramento, the Coalition to Authorize Regulated Sports Betting argues that it had collected 971,373 signatures in just eight weeks. Per the state attorney general’s office, the tribes need 997,139 signatures to get the measure on the ballot and were required to collect 110% of needed signatures, or 1,096,853, by July 20. The higher number is because referendums are verified, and some percentage of signatures are usually void. Initiatives have to be approved 180 days before the election, which would be June 25, and the tribes can’t possibly collect the remaining signatures and have them verified in the next 10 days.

California has been under some level of “lockdown” since March 20, with gatherings still prohibited and six-foot social distancing measures still in place,. Those make it challenging, at best, for anyone to collect signatures for a ballot initiative. Those signing are required to use a pen and provide identification, both of which require close contact. In addition, according to the lawsuit, signature verification workers have not been working because that work is “typically done in small, rented offices that do not meet the social distancing requirements.”

The tribes asked that the signature deadline be extended and that current signatures be considered valid in order to prevent the tribes from having to start over for 2022.

Sports betting in CA budget?

California has been a hotbed of sports betting discourse this month.  The state Senate is moving its own referendum through Sacramento, and it should be on the Appropriations Committee agenda for a vote on Thursday. The tribes are vehemently opposed to the legislative proposal and have voiced their concerns at several hearings.

And Monday, state lawmakers and the governor must approve a 2020-21 budget. The sides are at odds over multiple issues, but if the legislative budget is approved, it could include a mention of sports betting revenue.

The tribes were the first to make a move toward legal sports betting when in November the coalition got approval to gather signatures for the ballot initiative on Jan. 20. The one-page initiative reads, in part:

AUTHORIZES NEW TYPES OF GAMBLING. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY AMENDMENT. Allows federally recognized Native American tribes to operate roulette, dice games, and sports wagering on tribal lands, subject to compacts negotiated by the Governor and ratified by the Legislature. Beginning in 2022, allows on-site sports wagering at only privately operated horse-racing tracks in four specified counties for persons 21 years or older. Imposes 10% tax on sports-wagering profits at horse-racing tracks; directs
portion of revenues to enforcement and problem-gambling programs. Prohibits marketing of sports wagering to persons under 21.

Millions spent on signatures already

The tribes contend they spent $7 million to gather signatures so far and are entitled to an extension of the deadline in order to finish collecting them.

“The will of almost one million voters who signed the Initiative petition will have been frustrated,” lawyers for the coalition wrote in the lawsuit. They also request an expedited reply.

The coalition, which includes representatives from the Agua Caliente Band of Luiseno Indians, Barona Band of Mission Indians, Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians, and the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, contends it would have been finished collecting signatures by the end of April had COVID-19 not interfered. It was collecting an average of 100,000-120,000 signatures per week.

The tribes had collected 25% of needed signatures, which were certified by the state, by February. As of June 15, the initiative was one of 29 proposed listed as “active” on the state attorney general’s website. According to the site, no referendums have been approved for the November ballot.

As the tribes await an answer on whether or not they can collect more signatures, Sen. Bill Dodd and Rep. Adam Gray are pushing their own version of sports betting through the state legislature.

Tribal proposal vs. legislative proposal

The key differences between what the tribes want and the lawmakers want are:

  • Tribes want on-site sports betting only; lawmakers want to extend that to mobile/online sports betting;
  • The tribal referendum does not include a tax rate for Indian sportsbooks, but would impose a 10% tax on retail sports betting at horse racetracks; lawmakers included a workaround, requiring tribes to contract with commercial operators, who would be taxed at 10-15% of gross gaming revenue;
  • Tribes do not require use of “official league data”; the legislative bill does;
  • Tribes believe card rooms operate illegally in the state and the referendum allows for “private lawsuits to enforce” state gambling laws and protect their gaming exclusivity; the lawmaker version would put an end to the lawsuits and allow card rooms to continue to operate in the current fashion.

“While tribes like Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation support sports betting in California, tribal leaders are not willing to sacrifice the good-will of their guests and neighbors in order to get it.” https://t.co/F2o3uP6FJA

— Victor Rocha (@VictorRocha1) June 5, 2020

Both referendums would also allow for sports betting at four horse racetracks and promise more money flowing into state coffers, though the estimates are wildly different — the fiscal note on the proposed tribal referendum suggests the state could bring in “tens of millions” of dollars. On the flip side, lawmakers have suggested that their version of sports betting could bring in $500 million tax revenue annually.

A complete legislative fiscal analysis is not yet available, but according to the initial version, it will cost approximately $500,000 just to get an initiative on the ballot.

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country.

Related Posts

arizona sports betting
Regulation

Arizona Senate Approves Sports Betting, DFS Bill Amid Heated Debate

April 12, 2021
Baton-Rouge-Riverfront
Betting

Louisiana Sports Betting Bill Goes For The Gusto: Statewide Mobile, Including Bars, Restaurants

April 8, 2021
Load More

Top Sportsbooks In Your State

1
Monkey Knife Fight
Rating / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
PrizePicks
Rating / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.

Get Email Updates

State Sports Betting Guides

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
February 12, 2021

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
January 22, 2021

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
August 25, 2020

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Sportsbook Bonus Offers, Power Rankings, And Wagering Info

by Brett Smiley
September 10, 2019

Most Read Stories

Handicapping NY MSB

Handicapping The Race To Become A Sports Betting Platform Provider In New York

April 15, 2021
Texas Huberty sports betting

Huberty Set To Make Push For Sports Betting In Texas

April 13, 2021
arizona sports betting

Arizona Senate Approves Sports Betting, DFS Bill Amid Heated Debate

April 12, 2021
maryland sports betting

Maryland General Assembly Sends Sports Betting Framework To Governor

April 12, 2021

Problem Gambling

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA), 1-888-532-3500 (VA) or call/text TN REDLINE 1-800-889-9789 (TN).

Subscribe

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About
  • Contact

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Bill Tracker
    • Arizona
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Georgia
    • Illinois
    • Iowa
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Mississippi
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • West Virginia
  • MI
  • VA
  • NJ
  • PA
  • TN
  • IN
  • CO
  • Betting Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

Please share your location to continue

[ 'FBIOS', 'Twitter for iPhone', 'WebView', '(iPhone|iPod|iPad)(?!.*Safari/)', 'Android.*(wv|.0.0.0)' ]
[ 'FBIOS', 'Twitter for iPhone', 'WebView', '(iPhone|iPod|iPad)(?!.*Safari/)', 'Android.*(wv|.0.0.0)' ]