• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Things Turn Bitter In Fight For Connecticut Sports Betting, iGaming Legalization

Governor's attempt to get one tribe to agree to terms may have backfired

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
March 3, 2021
in Regulation
tug-of-war-game

(Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Things are getting real nasty on the Connecticut sports betting front.

Hours after representatives from Gov. Ned Lamont’s office and the state’s two federally recognized tribes played nice at a hearing before the Public Safety and Security Committee, Lamont decided to play hardball. And it appears that so far, anyway, his efforts have backfired.

“After months of closed-door negotiations, it’s offensive that Governor Lamont would announce an agreement with only one of the two Tribal Nations that have been a party to the negotiations, despite full knowledge that both sovereign Nations are needed to implement any agreement,” Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Chairman Rodney Butler said in a statement late Tuesday afternoon. “We have participated in these discussions in good faith and consider today’s events extremely disrespectful in terms of process and substance.”

Those comments came after Lamont’s office on Tuesday released key details of a deal with the Mohegan Tribe, which includes a 20% tax rate on iGaming and 13.75% on sports betting. The deal also allows the Connecticut Lottery to have its own digital platform and up to 15 retail sports betting locations.

Lamont making amends?

Wednesday, Lamont’s office offered up a bit of an olive branch with this statement released by his Chief of Staff Paul Mounds:

“The administration agrees that the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation must be a party in any agreement, and that this agreement is best for the entire state, especially Eastern Connecticut, where the tribes employ thousands of people and contribute significantly to local economies and communities. This expansion of gaming in Connecticut is a financial benefit to both tribes and will provide long-term stability for both sovereign governments. Governor Lamont is urging the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation to join this agreement immediately, and Eastern Connecticut legislators should do the same.”

Also on Wednesday, a coalition of lawmakers from eastern Connecticut, where the tribes are located, sent a letter to Lamont’s office calling the agreement “incomplete,” and saying they “cannot accept” the pact with the Mohegans if the Mashantucket Pequot are not included. The lawmakers set a Sunday deadline for the governor’s office to negotiate a deal.

NEW: Eastern CT lawmakers say they won’t support @GovNedLamont’s new sports betting deal until @FoxwoodsCT signs on too. Asking both sides to get it done by Sunday pic.twitter.com/WBLyZ4SXF5

— John Craven (@johncraven1) March 3, 2021

The question is, did Lamont’s actions on Tuesday derail progress that has been years in the making? Connecticut has only two federally recognized tribes, and they have had a monopoly on gaming in the state since the late 1980s. Since the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act was overturned in 2018, the sides have been trying to reach an agreement to bring sports betting to the state.

The tribes are already willing to do what many other tribes aren’t, which is offer off-reservation wagering by way of digital platforms. Many tribes decline to agree to this expansion, because they believe it may slow foot traffic at their casinos, which represent not only the core driver of their revenue, but jobs for thousands of tribal members. But Michigan’s tribes did embrace online sports betting and iGaming, viewing it as an additional revenue generator and a physical sportsbook amenity that may increase foot traffic by engaging a clientele that otherwise might not visit the hotel-casinos. The Mohegans (and presumably the Mashantucket Pequot) have also agreed to allow the Connecticut Lottery to have its own digital platform, meaning the tribes were willing to part with the duopoly they had been fighting for.

For months, and even Tuesday, Butler has been complimentary of the negotiating process with Lamont, whose team seemingly managed to give nearly every key party at least a sliver of the sports betting pie, based on the overview of the Mohegan compact that was released. The lottery gets its share, and it can in turn subcontract sports wagering to parimutuel facilities, which means state tracks and operator Sportech get in on the action, and the lottery must build retail facilities in Hartford and Bridgeport. The latter has been at the center of a fight for a commercial casino for years.

Mashantucket Pequot want lower tax rate

But during Tuesday’s hearing, Butler was clear that his tribe had not signed off on the current terms. He said the tribe and the state were at “fourth-and-inches” and both sides seemed ready to punch the ball across the goal line. Butler essentially said that his tribe needed just a little bit more on the money side of things to get the deal done. Tuesday afternoon, the Connecticut Mirror reported that Butler said his tribe is seeking an 18% tax rate for iGaming. The tribes already pay 25% on slot revenue, the highest percentage paid by a tribal nation to a state anywhere in the U.S.

The open question now is whether or not Lamont’s gamble to expose the details of the pact before the Mashantucket Pequots had signed off will work. Butler is clearly angered, but he did leave the door open for continued — and swift — resolution.

“Now that Governor Lamont has laid bare the confidential terms of our negotiations, you can see the significant and substantial concessions made by both Tribes,” Butler said in his statement. “Just permitting Lottery to participate in full sports betting, absent tax or revenue share, is a major allowance. We have one remaining point of contention that is easily resolved if some sense of mutual respect is afforded for the specific needs of our tribal community. We remain open to discussions and hope this is resolved quickly for the benefit of the entire state of Connecticut.”

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

oklahoma-city-sign-train-skyline
Legislation

Oklahoma Betting Bill That Would Put Tribes In Charge Passes House

March 23, 2023
Rob Carr/Getty Images
Features

Bill Murray Has UConn In His Bracket As Son Luke Looks To Lead Huskies to Final Four

March 21, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...