• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Connecticut Not Interested in Paying Leagues a Sports Betting ‘Royalty’

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
March 1, 2018
in Regulation
nba sports betting dan spillane

Spillane at a New York state hearing in Jan. 2018

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

While the Constitution State is aggressively moving toward drafting Connecticut sports betting legislation, lawmakers are clearly not married to paying the NBA and Major League Baseball the “integrity fee” both leagues have been lobbying for.

During Thursday’s Public Safety Committee Informational Forum, legislators from both the House and Senate repeatedly pressed representatives from the pro leagues about how the state – and their constituents – would benefit from paying the 1% fee the pro leagues have been pressing for. And what they would get from it. The fee, which ultimately works out about a 20-25% percent cut of sportsbook gross gaming revenue, is included in legislation working its way through other state assemblies.

The panel of lawmakers repeatedly called out the pro leagues, referring to the integrity fee as a “royalty” or a “processing fee.”

Connecticut Lawmakers Preparing Legal Sports Betting Legislation Did Their Homework, Not Interested In Giving Away Requested ‘Royalty’ to Leagues

Under pointed questioning, NBA Vice President Dan Spillane did admit that the fee is not solely to preserve the integrity of the game. Representative Alphonse Paolillio (D-New Haven) pushed on this point, saying that NBA commissioner Adam Silver’s comments during the league’s All-Star weekend earlier this year referred to the fee clearly as a royalty. Spillane did not disagree.

“It’s the value of our product, the royalty aspect,” Spillane said. “And then the risk that comes along with it. It’s a form of insurance … I guess we could have broken the fee down into buckets. It’s akin to a royalty of the value of product we deliver.”

From Representative Paolillio: “I think the [NBA] Commissioner is calling it what it is and getting away from the integrity talking point.”

But several of the Connecticut lawmakers believe sports betting already provides great value to the leagues, in terms of engagement, potential marketing relationships and sponsorships.

We also learned that Representative Fishbein — giving an example of fantasy sports and the effect of having some financial stake — stays up into the wee hours to monitor the players on his fantasy baseball team.

Rep. Fishbein: I believe that gambling does increase your viewership. Fishbein is a commish of a longstanding fantasy baseball league, he says! If not for fantasy baseball "I wouldn't be up at 1am listening to a Mariners game on the west coast." Hahaha.

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) March 1, 2018

Verrengia: "What I'm not for is legislation that in some way, shape or form would line the pockets of MLB, NBA or any other major sports owners." Says there's value — in mktg in arenas or whatever. Those are the benefits of legalized sports wagering and additional rev streams.

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) March 1, 2018

There appeared to be little tolerance for the idea of paying the leagues any sort of fee

The Connecticut Capitol building

“I want my people to get the most bang for their buck,” said Representative Michael Dimassa (D- New Haven, West Haven).  “So if there’s a 1% fee I want some accountability.”

The biggest zinger may have come from Representative Daniel Rovero (D-Killingly, Putnam, Thompson), who took the time to make a pointed joke, saying he was “glad I didn’t get involved with you people,” when talking about going into business. Rovero went on to say that he thought the leagues were asking for too much.

[Stay tuned at our Facebook page and Twitter @sports_handle for the latest]

The general gist appears to be that Connecticut is not amenable to paying the “integrity fee” or a royalty. While Spillane and his Major League Baseball counterpart Vice President, Investigations & Deputy General Counsel Bryan Seeley tried to point out that the fee would come from sportsbook receipts, the panel would have none of it, effectively saying that any money being paid to the leagues was not money that would stay in Connecticut.

A DraftKings representative had a word at the panel, too

Connecticut Lawmakers Preparing Legal Sports Betting Legislation Did Their Homework, Not Interested In Giving Away Requested 'Royalty' to Leagues

Just this week the daily fantasy sports leader DraftKings announced the hiring of a sportsbook director. They’re betting on sports betting, like many others, and the Massachusetts-headquartered company had a seat at this table. Here you can view the full prepared remarks of Sarah Koch, Assistant Director of Government Affairs at DraftKings. Emphasis added:

According to reports by the American Gaming Association and a study by Ernst and Young, more than 750,000 Connecticut residents are currently betting on sports illegally to the tune of more than $1.5 billion in bets per year, nearly all online. Gaming industry experts Eilers and Krejcik project that if legalized sports betting is offered only at Connecticut’s casinos– with no online options – the illegal market would continue to thrive and more than half a million Connecticut residents would simply continue betting online with offshore sites.

If Connecticut wants to eliminate the thriving offshore sports betting market, the state should consider allowing online sports betting. Not only would online options help end the black market, the state would see greater benefit. According to Oxford Economics, including online sports betting would more than double the estimated gross gaming revenue in the state from $130 million for casino-only betting, to almost $300 million by adding online options.

Final thoughts

While the whole “integrity” or “royalty” is getting some traction in Missouri and Illinois, Connecticut didn’t show interest in putting the state or constituents on the hook for it.

Rep. Jeffrey J. Berger: To acquiesce to your request, NV and no other state would not be subject to that fee, and we might be at a disadvantage.

Now they're discussing Wire Act! Seely says states won't be competing that way. (This ignores taxation/revenue and operate revenue)

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) March 1, 2018

As Connecticut and other states continue to sift through information and ideas while crafting sports gambling legislation, they should all take note. They won’t get any help – and will likely get a lot of pushback – from MLB and the NBA should they choose not to pay off the leagues for what Connecticut lawmakers clearly view as a poorly veiled kickback. Connecticut lawmakers had planned additional hearings for March 8, but those hearings have been postponed to March 13, due to snowstorms.

Asked Representative Kurt Vail (D-Somers and Strafford) of MLB representative Seeley: Would you still be in favor of [legal sports gambling in Connecticut] if we eliminated that 1% fee?

“No,” said Seeley, without hesitation.

But it is now obvious that the leagues would settle for a lesser amount, if they don’t have to settle for nothing.


Also From SportsHandle:

Best Sports Betting Scenes: In ‘Bronx Tale,’ ‘We Can’t Win, Mush Bet Kryptonite’

West Virginia Official Discusses State’s Sports Betting Bill and Future of Wagering

Round-up of Predictions on Supreme Court Ruling on PASPA, Sports Betting

Podcast ‘The Hedge: Why I Gamble With Jimmy Shapiro’ with Vegas Icon Dave Cokin Part I

Share1TweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

Rob Carr/Getty Images
Features

Bill Murray Has UConn In His Bracket As Son Luke Looks To Lead Huskies to Final Four

March 21, 2023
wood-maple-syrup-sign-barn
Legislation

Is Vermont Preparing To Consider Legalizing Sports Betting?

September 21, 2022
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...