• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Both Major California Political Parties Now Oppose Proposition 27

Consultants say it's highly unusual for the two key parties to be against the same ballot initiative

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
August 22, 2022
in Legislation
GOP-Democratic-logo-pins

Shutterstock

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a situation that political and gaming consultants say they haven’t seen before, both major parties in California have now come out in opposition to Proposition 27, the statewide mobile wagering initiative backed by the a group of seven commercial operators.

Late Friday, the California Republican Party announced its opposition, joining the Democrats, who stated their position in late July. The Democrats also said they will remain neutral on the tribal-backed, retail-only Proposition 26. The Republicans voted to oppose it.

“Prop 27 breaks the promise made to California’s Native American tribes to grant them the sovereign right to operate gaming in California in order to improve the lives of their communities across the state,” Jessica Millan Patterson, chairwoman of the California Republican Party, said in a press release. “We stand with California tribes and oppose Prop 27.”

One political consultant said she has never worked on or seen a campaign that both parties have opposed, while a gaming consultant said he’s never seen this kind of political opposition to a gaming initiative.

According to a press release from “No on 27,” 60 elected officials from both parties across the state oppose the measure, as well as the California Teachers Association, League of California Cities, and Veterans of Foreign Wars (California Department). Major League Baseball this month announced its support for the measure.

“It is certainly a bold statement that both parties have come out opposed to Prop 27,” consultant Brendan Bussmann of Las Vegas-based B Global wrote in an email. “I think that speaks volumes for the hometown team’s ability to articulate a message to local stakeholders.

“This has always been a ballot initiative that is going to be won with an air and ground game. This opposition speaks more to the ground game than anything else. However, there is still roughly 30 percent of the vote that doesn’t identify with a party sitting out there.”

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

Advertising is confusing

Since Proposition 27 was approved for the ballot in late June, residents have been pummeled with ads from both sides on television, through streaming services, on social media, on billboards, and even with pop-up ads while surfing the net. Campaigns from both propositions have been using tribal leaders as critical parts of their advertising, which appears to be confusing voters. Anecdotally, several California voters told Sports Handle they won’t vote for legal sports betting at all, as they can’t determine the differences between the proposals and who would benefit.

In California, we see endless ads for a couple of bills that essentially have to do with legalizing sports betting in the state.

But even after watching a few hundred spots, I had no idea what the bills were about.

Cash has broken politics and maybe thought in general. pic.twitter.com/PJD0BuTDw1

— Dave Pell (@davepell) August 21, 2022

While Proposition 27 is backed by a coalition including  Bally’s, BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, FanDuel, PENN Entertainment/Barstool Sportsbook, and WynnBET, it also has the support of three smaller gaming tribes, who in advertising have said that Proposition 26 would really only benefit the biggest, richest gaming tribes.

None of the tribes on any side of the issue have been available for comment since the advertising blitz began.

“While party endorsements still mean something, the influence of political parties is becoming less and less as we shift to more individual driven efforts which clouds issue campaigns allegiances,” Bussmann said. “This is going to be won or lost by reaching voters directly and maximizing the spend to establish a ground game. The opposition has the advantage on that right now.”

Money still rolling in

According to campaign finance reports and local media accounts, funding for the gambling campaigns has now reached about $357 million. BetMGM, DraftKings, Fanatics, FanDuel, and PENN Entertainment have each put $25 million toward “Yes on 27,” and Bally’s Interactive and Wynn Interactive have each contributed $12.5 million. Opposition groups and those supporting Proposition 26 have added another approximately $180 million.

The funding has blown away California’s previous costliest campaign. In 2020, DoorDash, Lyft, and Uber amassed a $200 million war chest in an effort to defeat a law that would have classified their drivers as employees. The proposition passed, but it has since been deemed unconstitutional by a California Superior Court judge.

The Bay Area News Group (BANG) on Monday reported that sports betting campaigns have raised an average of $16.5 million per week since June 30.

“You aren’t going to be able to watch evening news, a football game or a YouTube video without seeing a message on these initiatives,” Thad Kousser, professor of political science at UC San Diego and co-director of the Yankelovich Center for Social Science Research, told BANG. “It is worth it to spend a couple hundred million to gain, essentially, a monopoly over a multibillion-dollar industry.”

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

josh naylor
Industry

April Brings Newcomer Ohio Its Lowest Betting Activity Thus Far

May 31, 2023
whats on tap
Industry

What’s On Tap: NBA Finals, Stanley Cup Finals, And French Open Early Rounds

May 29, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

paspa ruling

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
inside-fanatics-sportsbook-fedex-field

Sources: Fanatics Enters Advanced Talks With PointsBet On Transformative U.S. Deal

May 12, 2023
new york times headquarters

The ‘Risky Wager’ Series From New York Times Was No Hit Piece — It’s Reality

May 31, 2023
cincinnati-bearcats-signage

Failing To Report Wagering Violations A No-No, NCAA Says

May 25, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
May 16, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
May 2, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
April 24, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
May 3, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News