• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Maryland Lawmakers Hear Plenty As Sports Betting Framework Takes Shape

Bill hearing reveals concerns about minority participation, problem gambling, and operators' desire for more licenses

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
February 26, 2021
in Regulation
maryland sports betting

Maryland State House (Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Maryland House of Delegates on Thursday afternoon took a small but necessary and important step toward implementing the framework for legal sports betting in the state — an expansion that voters overwhelmingly approved via ballot referendum in the NovemberΒ  2020 election. The House Ways and Means Committee heard from proponents and some critics of the betting bill, with testimony from roughly 25 interested parties including representatives for the Maryland State Fair, lobbyists for national sportsbook operators, problem gambling advocates, and others.

The bill under discussion is HB 940, sponsored by House Speaker Adrienne Jones. It did not go to vote Thursday, but it appears poised to advance to the floor this session, which ends April 12. In 2020 both chambers actively discussed how to shape a legal sports betting framework in the state, but due to the havoc wreaked by the unfurling COVID-19 pandemic, leaders decided it was wisest to simply put the ballot question up for voters first and figure out the details later, which is now occurring.

During the roughly three-hour hearing, three key discussion points repeatedly emerged: interest in increasing the number of licenses for digital brands available from 10 to 20 (or more); ensuring that minority businesses and business people have legitimate opportunities to participate in the market in both procurement and as actual equity owners with licensees; and making sure that Maryland keeps up with its neighbors such as Virginia, by implementing a competitive framework that will generate as much revenue as market forces will allow to benefit all Maryland students’ education.

β€œA disparity study review found that minorities are historically shut out of as meaningful participants in the gaming industry in Maryland,” said Jones, discussing the importance of provisions in the bill to put minorities on equal footing.

The committee did not take a vote but received a range of testimony and calls for certain amendments to address the concerns laid out above. There is not yet a companion bill in the Senate, but it is expected to materialize after a work group comes to a consensus on how best to proceed. Fantasy sports contests are also considered in the bill with new taxes levied on those operators.

Here’s a look at the details

Some of the issues brought up last session included how to handle mobile vs brick-and-mortar operation, where funds go, if teams should have licenses, minority involvement in the business and more.

— Wes Brown (@W_Brown21) February 25, 2021

After Jones gave an overview, Delegate Eric Ebersole reviewed key points in the framework of the bill. It would:

  • Allow eight β€œClass A” physical sportsbook licenses to the state’s six casinos and certain racetracks.
  • Allow β€œClass B” licenses for five more β€œcompetitively bid physical locations” at least 10 miles from the Class A locations.
  • Make 10 mobiles licenses available to operators that do not necessarily have to be tethered to the physical locations.
  • Impose a tax of 15% for the first $5 million gross gaming revenue and 17.5% for anything beyond that, all of it benefiting the state’s Blueprint Fund.
  • Set the following fees: Class A applications, $250,000 and annual fees of $50,000,Β  and after five years, renewal fee of 1% GGR for previous five years; Class BΒ  applications $50,000 and annual fees, and after renewal fee of 1% GGR for previous five years;
  • Set the fee for mobile-only licenses at $500,000 (application) and $100,000 (annual renewal).
  • Create a licensure review commission to review all applications.

On balance, Maryland appears to be on track for a reasonably competitive market. However, amendments are coming primarily aimed at increasing the number of licenses to 20, so there are not only a pair of licenses available beyond the eight to 10 that would likely go to the physical locations. The general sentiment expressed by various stakeholders: Why not open up the competition and make more licenses available to minority and local groups?

β€œDuring this process we will hear from many special interests — regional and otherwise,” said Delegate Eric Luedtke, a supporter of the measure. “Our job is to find the public interest, making sure our commercial gaming industry is competitive with other states. And this bill will do that. It will provide access as the voters approved wagering in person and online, and get the revenue we need to fund programs we care about. It will raise revenue for our schools.”

Luedtke also underscored Speaker Jones’ emphasis on securing minority business owner participation in this market.

β€œWe must create opportunities for minority business owners to own equity in these licenses in a way this state has rarely provided in the gaming industry, he said. β€œHorse racing, OTBs, bingo halls, are almost entirely white-owned. There are provisions crafted here to abide by legal standards, but set Maryland out as the national leader in providing opportunities for minority ownership and equity in the gaming industry to create truly equitable economy.”

But questions persisted as to how to actually accomplish this goal. Delegate Jason Buckel inquired what criteria would be used, whether to set aside a targeted percentage of licenses, use a weighted criterion, or actually implement a mandate.

Maryland State Fair wants piece of the action

Thomas Kelso, Chairman of the Maryland Stadium Authority, says that teams in Maryland should be able to have sports gaming licenses.

He notes that fans may be more inclined to stay home and gamble on events, lowering ticket sales or money for other local businesses.

— Wes Brown (@W_Brown21) February 25, 2021

The committee heard testimony from over 25 witnesses, several of them representing the Maryland State Fair, who insisted that the nonprofit group should have a seat at the table, holding that it would indeed boost revenue generation as the current home of the highest-performing OTB in the state.

Christian Goode, CEO of IG Acquisition Group and founder of Ivory Gaming Group, testified about the importance of increasing the number of mobile licenses available.

“Several states allow more than 10, and we would support as many operators as possible to develop the most robust market,” he said. “Virginia received 25 applications for just 12 licenses.Β  Maryland will receive more than that. It’s a means to provide a seat at the table for diverse entities to participate, not just the established casinos. It will lead to a robust sports wagering industry within the state of Maryland.”

The committee also heard from Erin Weinstock, a University of Maryland law student and Rule 19 student attorney, concerning problem gambling measures. She emphasized the importance of collecting information about gambling treatment programs, ensuring that operators offer only responsible advertisements, and requiring licensees to develop safe platforms.

She also advocated for a reporting requirement in the bill. Around the country, enabling legislation requires regulators to report vastly different information about total bets made and revenue generated, including within which sports and so forth. Some states require only a bare minimum. In other words, Weinstock encourages total transparency.

No other hearing is currently set for the bill, but it is expected to gain a favorable report and move forward. In the event that some version of this bill’s framework reaches Gov. Larry Hogan’s desk this session, it is possible that sportsbooks would go live sometime in the first quarter of 2022, perhaps a bit sooner.

ShareTweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

shyanne-sellers-celebrates-ncaa-tournament
Legislation

Maryland Sports Betting Bills Make It Through Crossover Day

March 21, 2023
gambling addiction
Industry

What’s Wrong With Responsible Gambling?

March 16, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 23, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 23, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...