• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Missouri Committee Moves Sports Betting Legislation Forward With Reservations

Taxes, promotional write-offs, and an 'off-site user fee' all remain points of discussion

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
March 2, 2022
in Sports
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A Missouri House committee consolidated, amended, and moved forward sports betting legislation Wednesday, but not before making clear that more compromise around problem gambling, the tax rate, and an “off-site user’s fee” would need to take place.

A pair of bills, HB 2502 and HB 2556, that have the support of major stakeholders including casinos and professional sports teams, were consolidated into HB 2502 in the House Special Committee on Public Policy. An amendment was added that would double the commitment for problem and responsible gambling funding to $500,000 from $250,000.

The amendment also tinkers with promotional-play write-offs. In the initial versions of the bills, operators would have been able to write off promotional play in perpetuity. The amendment allows for a 100% write-off in the first year, with steps down over five years until promotional play could not be written off.

Amendment 3, sponsored by Rep. Ben Baker, passed the committee, which then passed the consolidated bill, 4-2-1, sending it to the House floor. Ahead of the vote, committee Chair Scott Cupps said he would defer his vote unless there was a tie, and Vice Chair Dottie Bailey said she’d vote for the new bill, but didn’t promise she’d support it on the House floor.

“It is too soon to take this vote,” Bailey told her peers. “But if you throw enough tantrums in this building … and money talks,” she said, while clearly suggesting that fellow lawmakers had been swayed by lobbyists and campaign contributions. “I think we need more time to talk this through.”

Sports betting a ‘Pandora’s box’

Sports betting has been a contentious issue in Missouri since 2018, when the federal Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act was overturned. In the past, bills linking sports betting with video lottery terminals have stalled in the Senate, but this year, on the House side, at least, the issues and interest level have changed. A consortium of casinos and professional sports teams crafted legislation that was set for a vote on Monday, but was then taken off the agenda.

“Clearly there is more work to do in Missouri, and it is up to the industry to help legislators understand the benefits of sports betting and how it works,” consultant Brendan Bussmann told Sports Handle. “Based off of committee comments, clearly some legislators need clarity on how this would work.”

Sources told Sports Handle that House leadership forced the committee’s collective hand and all but demanded a vote on Wednesday. But the committee was clearly hesitant. In addition to other concerns, Cupps also addressed the limited number of digital platforms that would be available, should sports betting be legalized.

STATEMENT: We applaud @DanHoux @phlchristo & entire committee for moving sports betting legislation forward. When done correctly, a regulated market creates a safe alternative for consumers and drive significant tax revenue for the state. It’s time for #Missouri to play. #MoLeg

— iDEA Growth (@iDEA_Growth) March 2, 2022

The legislation currently allows for three digital skins, or platforms, per retail casino, with a cap of six per company. Penn National Gaming (Barstool Sportsbook) and Caesars each own three properties and would get six skins each under the proposal. Boyd Gaming (FanDuel), Century Casinos, and Affinity Gaming each have two retail properties and would also get six skins, while Bally’s has one property and could get up to three skins. Six more skins would be earmarked for the sports teams.

“I personally think the bill needs work” on problem gambling issues, Cupps said ahead of the vote. “And we potentially need to look at the tax rate if we are going to open this Pandora’s box. We need to look at licenses — they are going to be a golden ticket — not right now, but [in the future.] To limit the number of licenses like we have, the ability to be able to sell or lease them, they will be of insane value.

“And what about rural Missouri? They have no teams, no casinos, but their residents will be betting and creating a funnel of money going right to other counties.”

Brianne Doura-Schawohl, a national consultant on the topic of problem gambling, said of the committee’s attention to it: “I applaud the chairman and Rep. Baker for taking a strong stance on this important public health issue prior to legalization. More work needs to be done before passage, and I’m hopeful that Missouri will finally remedy some of the shortcomings of their problem gambling deficit in the state.”

Doura-Schawohl said that while up to 40 states allocate 37 cents per person for problem and responsible gaming programs, Missouri currently allots 3 cents.

Key issues

Here’s a look at the issues Cupps brought up:

  • While Amendment 3 doubles the amount initially earmarked for problem and responsible gambling, advocates will likely want more, potentially asking for a percentage of gross gaming revenue with a minimum annual commitment of $500,000 or more. Advocates also want tougher guardrails around advertising and want the state to reduce the number of helplines available. There are currently three, and experts say research indicates that multiple lines can confuse potential users.
  • As proposed, the tax rate would be set at 10%, but Cupps said neighboring states have higher tax rates, so maybe lawmakers should consider increasing it. Illinois and Tennessee offer statewide mobile wagering with tax rates of 15% and 20%, respectively.
  • The introduction of an “off-site users fee” remains to be settled. Such a fee would be the first of its kind, and could ultimately require bettors to pay a small fee — probably $2 or $3 — for the privilege of placing a wager on a digital platform. Missouri retail casinos at one time charged an entry fee, but the idea behind a digital users fee would be to funnel money back to the state’s rural counties.

I want to “revisit the off-site fee,” Cupps said. “Rural Missouri wants some crumbs — their words, not mine.” Cupps said he has heard (presumably from operators) that it’s not feasible to track a user fee. He termed it a “fallacy,” however, to believe that companies with technology to enable in-game betting would be unable to figure out how to charge and disburse such a fee.

That said, how to track where a bet originated and then tax it has come up in other states. In Arizona and Connecticut, digital sports betting went live throughout both states but not on Indian reservations, because the states and operators weren’t sure how to trace where a bet came from and whether to tax it (bets on tribal lands aren’t taxed by the state in either case). The solution could ultimately be multiple servers — one on reservation and one off. The idea of putting a server in every county doesn’t seem to be a plausible solution for Missouri.

Bailey suggested the user fee and an increased tax rate during a hearing last week.

The issue of how to handle promotional play is also key for operators, who often offer big promotions when states go live. For example, Caesars offered $3,000 in “free bets” during recent launches in both New York and Louisiana. In most states, those bonuses don’t count toward gross gaming revenue, meaning the operators don’t have to pay taxes on them.

In most states, the tax rate is assessed on gross gaming revenue, and in some states, funds for problem gambling or other funding are linked to GGR. As sports betting has proliferated, states and some stakeholders have seen potential funding drop as promotional play is not counted in the total.

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

kansas-city-royals-clubhouse
Legislation

Missouri House Sends Legal Sports Betting Bill To Senate

March 22, 2023
BetMGM Massachusetts bonus code graphic with Wildcats player Desi Sills
Legislation

Missouri House Advances Legal Wagering

March 20, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 24, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 24, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...