• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

How Has NBA Commissioner’s Call For ‘Fair Result’ on Sports Betting Unfolded?

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
March 17, 2018
in Regulation, Sports
If New Jersey Loses the Supreme Court Sports Betting Case, How Long Will Legal Sports Betting in the U.S. Take and How Might It Happen?

NBA Commissioner Adam Silver

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Correction: In an earlier version of this article, we incorrectly attributed NBA Commissioner Adam Silver’s comments in a Forbes article as having occurred this past week. In fact, Silver made the comments referenced therein during the All-Star Break in mid-February. We regret the error.

In mid-February, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver publicly weighed in on the ongoing multi-state tug-of-war over the direction and contours of legal sports betting legislation in the U.S. The battle? The leagues want money and control over an annual multi-billion dollar pie of sports wagers — in the name of preserving sporting integrity.

The NBA in lockstep with Major League Baseball had lined up talking points and lobbyists. Meanwhile, scores of lawmakers in a growing number of states have considered the possibility of expanded sports wagering, some of them realizing the types of questions they would need to ask and answer to properly account for the respective interest of the leagues, their states, their state gaming commissions (or lotteries), and their possible to-be commercial licensed operators.

“I would only say from the NBA’s standpoint we will spend this year roughly $7.5 billion creating this content, creating these games,” Silver said at the February press conference at the NBA All-Star Weekend. “Those are total expenses for the season. So this notion that as the intellectual property creators that we should receive a 1% fee seems very fair to me.”

In Mid-February, NBA Commissioner Adam Silver Re-entered the Conversation on Sports Betting Legislation. The Discussion Has Advanced at Breakneck Speed All Over the U.S.  

nba sports betting

We are drawing nearer to the decision date (between next week and end of June) in Murphy v NCAA, aka the Supreme Court Sports Betting Case, which could spell the elimination of the 1992 federal ban (PASPA) on full-fledged sports wagering outside Nevada.

Numerous hearings on sports betting have occurred over the past month in legislative committees nationwide. New bills are frequently getting introduced. Existing bills are moving through committees. Some states are pumping brakes, others pressing the gas. Some of these bills favor the leagues’ power grab, some bills are actually rational and would benefit states and leagues alike.

The leagues have made no less than five different types of arguments attempting to justifying the “integrity fee” and have even tried to deflect blame for the euphemism to the media. (When in doubt, blame the media.)

[Stay tuned at our Facebook page and Twitter @sports_handle for the latest]

While the leagues’ push for a 1% “integrity fee” off-the-top cut of wagers (equivalent to a 20-25% take from operator revenue) — purportedly to compensate them for integrity monitoring services and/or as a royalty fee — has garnered the most attention in statehouses and the media, the data rights issue is vital, too, and an overlooked subplot.

Because one of the main features of the the league-designed “Model Legislation” is the right to control which data sportsbooks use to grade wagers for both in-play wagering and in general, as well as the right to restrict state-licensed sportsbooks from offering certain wagers.

This control would allow the league to sell data that it produces in-house or has already sold rights to a partner to produce for it. And who knows how much that would cost an operator in the absence of any competing service.

A ‘Fair Result’ Was Silver’s Standpoint… So Now Where Do Thing Now Stand?

Here’s The NBA, MLB’s ‘Model’ Legal Sports Betting Playbook: The ‘Model Sports Wagering Act’ for Gaming States, Which Contains the League Wish List

Almost exactly one month after Silver weighed in, some observers more bullish on the leagues’ chances to secure the passage of their version of a fair (i.e. profitable) piece of legislation, based on the influence they wield and the resources they have devoted to their messaging on the issue.

From my vantage, the leagues took the early lead in Indiana and Missouri and a few other states, but their arguments have become conflated and confusing. The arguments were disingenuous to begin with and now they’re now disassembling in plain sight.

From the outset, the leagues tied the 1% fee to “integrity” then admitted it was a royalty, now they call it some combination of both. “It’s the value of our product, the royalty aspect,” NBA SVP Dan Spillane said on March 1. “And then the risk that comes along with it. It’s a form of insurance … I guess we could have broken the fee down into buckets. It’s akin to a royalty of the value of product we deliver.”

There’s only one bucket and the ball is on the rim. It’s greed. And it’s insulted the intelligence of of those who are listening, and a lot of lawmakers are in that camp.

"I don't see why we should give you 1% for anything" says Senator Facemire to MLB's Blair. "Why should we pay you to protect you own interests. Especially 1% off the top. "It's ike we're paying the insurance premium" on your game." #hammer

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) February 12, 2018

Connecticut lawmakers were skeptical of the leagues’ ask in early March. One Connecticut state senator (Representative Craig Fishbein) pointed out that giving leagues the exclusive right to control data would be tantamount to granting them a monopoly. Another Connecticut lawmaker noted that giving the fee would mean less dollars for the state, and would put their state’s operators at a market disadvantage.

Rep. Fishbein: Couldn't bookmakers subscribe to another data service? Why wouldn't we consider instead of a private monopoly of data? Indeed. This has been addressed in United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. https://t.co/prWLj9O5oJ.

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) March 1, 2018

At a Connecticut public hearing this past week where Seth Young, on behalf of the influential, Foxwoods Resort Casino hammered the leagues’ argument in written testimony, and demonstrated the hypocrisy:

Connecticut Sports Betting Gets Big Support From State Lottery And Influential Tribal Casino-Resort Foxwoods As State Looks to Move Forward on Legal Sports Betting

Also in Kansas this past week, another big stakeholder Hollywood Casino (owned by Penn National Gaming) hit hard against the leagues’ positions. Although, Kansas lawmakers as a whole appear to be pumping the brakes so they can better understand how the sports betting market works.

But another Kansas lawmaker pointedly asked and MLB official if the leagues were still taking taxpayer dollars to finance their stadiums. The MLB official admitted, after pause, that indeed they are.

Earlier this month West Virginia gave the leagues none of what they sought in a bill that is now law.

Landmark West Virginia Sports Betting Bill Passes Both Chambers, Goes Back to Senate for Concurrence And Passage Expected: Winners & Losers
The West Virginia State Capitol

I believe the leagues are going to lose the “wars” in Connecticut, Iowa, Mississippi, and Delaware (which already has legal NFL parlay wagering and pays zero dollars to the leagues); and the leagues have already lost in West Virginia. New York (population 18 million) is an important wild card at this point, with a quasi, capped fee and some wonky tiered data structure currently on the table.

Notably and not surprisingly, the states without professional sports teams are having an easier time shaking the leagues’ influence. 

[Stay tuned at our Facebook page and Twitter @sports_handle for the latest]

Some northeast dominoes may fall: Connecticut competes with neighbor Massachusetts, whose gaming commission recently published a white paper highlighting the potential negative impact of the “integrity fee” as a matter of finances and public policy (“anything that reduces the limited profitability of sports betting will impact the odds and products that legal sports betting operators will offer. If the betting options are not attractive to bettors, there will be little incentive for bettors to leave the illegal market”). Massachusetts competes with Rhode Island. Pennsylvania already passed a bill in 2017 without any league-pushed terms and the state faces a budget crisis.

That would be eight states right (CT, DE, IA, MA, MS, PA, RI, WV), including New Jersey which, if it wins the Supreme Court case, is going to immediately open betting shops. And they will give the league the middle finger, then get flagged for 15 yards on the ensuing kickoff for excessive celebration.

At some later date, no matter which side wins the Supreme Court case, the leagues will go over the states and push a higher, centralized power to adopt their positions: Members of U.S. Congress.

Funny, considering a states’ rights and federalism matter triggered the case in the first place.

Share7TweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

WynnBET promo code graphic with Celtics player Jayson Tatum.
Promotions

WynnBET Massachusetts Promo Code Unlocks Bet $100, Get $100 Offer for Celtics-Rockets, Any Matchup

March 13, 2023
Caesars Sportsbook Promo Code graphic featuring Knicks player Quentin Grimes.
Promotions

Caesars Sportsbook Promo Code HANDLENEWSFULL Earns $1,250 Offer for Sunday Games

March 5, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 31, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News