• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

North Dakota Lawmaker Seeks 24-Month Waiting Period For Online Sports Betting

Latest proposals include digital delay, ban on funding accounts with credit cards, prohibiting betting on local colleges

Jill R. Dorson by Jill R. Dorson
March 16, 2021
in Regulation
Downtown-Fargo-North-Dakota

(Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

As a sports betting proposal continues moving through the North Dakota legislature, it’s looking more and more like statewide digital sports wagering won’t arrive until late 2025 — at the very earliest. That is, if an amended version of HB 1234 moves forward and voters legalize sports betting on the 2022 ballot.

To recap, the North Dakota House in late February approved a pair of sports betting bills — one that would send the issue to the voters, and a second (HB 1234) that lays out the framework. Earlier in the month, the Senate shot down SB 2314, which would have given the state’s tribes exclusivity to mobile wagering.

And on Monday, when bill sponsor Rep. James Kasper introduced HB 1234 to the Senate Committee on Finance and Taxation, he pointed out some key changes he’d like to see, including giving local businesses with retail wagering (via kiosk) a 24-month head start on digital platforms, prohibiting the use of credit cards to fund mobile accounts, and banning betting on North Dakota college teams.

The bill would allow for kiosks at just about any business entity that wants one, from bars and restaurants to hotels or event centers, and has low tax rates — 6.75% on retail wagering and 10% on digital wagering.

Pushing for a digital waiting period

Kasper’s comments suggest North Dakota lawmakers not only want to give their businesses a leg up on sports betting, but that there is some concern about allowing digital operators into the state too soon. The original bill called for a 16-month waiting period for digital operators, but after hearing from local stakeholders, Kasper wants to up that number to 24 months. If passed, the effective date of the new law would be Aug. 1, 2023. From there, regulators would need to develop rules and license operators, which generally takes a minimum of four months (in the very best-case scenario), meaning the earliest possible online launch target would be late 2025.

“The DraftKings of the world, and the people who do mobile devices, they have absolutely no economic effect on our state other than taxes,” Kasper said in introducing his bill. “There is no work, except maybe some advertising. The kiosks, there are kiosk owners, they have to contact business owners in parts of our state, they have to provide support if they need it. …  If mobile and retail start at the same time, then the mobile will garner 80-90% of the market, because there is no overhead and no catch-up and no lag time. In order to provide an opportunity for local business development … this bill provides for 24 months for kiosks to get started.”

BREAKING:

Casino Queen in Illinois will rebrand retail and online platforms as "@DraftKings at Casino Queen," meaning DK can enter Illinois market for sports betting sooner than later.https://t.co/a3jCq8XmtJ

— Sports Handle (@sports_handle) July 23, 2020

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

Illinois lawmakers included a similar provision in their sports wagering law, giving local casinos an 18-month head start on stand-alone mobile platforms, but in the end, both DraftKings and FanDuel found a way to circumvent the waiting period, aided by an COVID-related executive order to lift the in-person registration requirement.

Whether or not national operators would try to find a workaround in North Dakota is unknown.

DraftKings discourages delay, bans

Rebecca London, government affairs manager for DraftKings, didn’t directly address the idea that her company “has no overhead” or has “no economic affect” on a state other than taxes, but she did assert it’s been proven that a competitive market nets the most revenue and that any kind of ban on or impediment to wagering only helps the illegal market continue to thrive.

“DraftKings supports a sports wagering framework that protects consumers, generates maximum revenue for the state, and stamps out the pervasive illegal market,” she testified via video link. “There should be no unnecessary hurdles for consumers to bet in the regulated market. … it is crucial to allow for the ability to register and fund an account from a mobile device, and I would encourage you to allow people to register with a credit card, like they can in the illegal market.

“I would urge you to consider amending the ban on college sports. Wagers on college sports are happening in the illegal market … and consumers will continue to wager on the illegal market because it’s unlikely they will use multiple platforms.”

@CommonManRadio NV sports books lifted the ban on NV college sports betting 10 yrs ago to eliminate any thought that the fix could be in.

— Doug Wilhelm (@vegasbucks) April 29, 2016

Should North Dakota lawmakers choose to ban betting on local college, they won’t be the first — Illinois, New York, and Virginia are among more that a dozen states that limit betting on collegiate athletics in some fashion.

Multiple groups, including several tribes and a religious group, testified in opposition to the bill. The tribes, represented by the United Tribes Gaming Association, are opposed to statewide mobile gaming, suggesting it would hurt their retail business. Collette Brown, gaming executive director for the Spirit Lake Nation, pointed to e-tab machines as hurting the tribes’ business and said that adding yet another gaming option would cause further harm.

This bill is just “adding salt to our wounds. We have seen a 65% decrease in our Class III revenues and we cannot sustain that anymore.”

The hearing ended with no vote or resolution of the issues discussed. The North Dakota legislature is in session until April 28.

ShareTweetShare
Jill R. Dorson

Jill R. Dorson

Jill has covered everything from steeplechase to the NFL and then some during a more than 30-year career in sports journalism. The highlight of her career was covering Oakland Raiders during the Charles Woodson/Jon Gruden era, including the infamous “Snow Bowl” and the Raiders’ 2003 trip to Super Bowl XXXVII. Her specialty these days is covering sports betting legislation across the country. You can reach Jill at [email protected]

Related Posts

FanDuel $1 billion revenue New York
Analysis

FanDuel Tops $1 Billion In New York Mobile Sports Wagering Revenue

June 5, 2023
north-carolina-basketball-shirt
Legislation

North Carolina Senate Approves Amended Sports Betting Bill

June 1, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

colts logo

Source: ‘Pervasive’ Wagering From Colts Player Includes Bets On His Own Team

June 5, 2023
paspa ruling

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
inside-fanatics-sportsbook-fedex-field

Sources: Fanatics Enters Advanced Talks With PointsBet On Transformative U.S. Deal

May 12, 2023
new york times headquarters

The ‘Risky Wager’ Series From New York Times Was No Hit Piece — It’s Reality

May 31, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
May 16, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
May 2, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
April 24, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
May 3, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News