• About Us / Contact
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

The Times, They Aren’t A-Changing: Offshore Sportsbooks Still Have Their Hooks In Mainstream Media

Who will tell the Gray Lady what a legal sportsbook is?

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
August 7, 2020
in Opinion
(Shutterstock)

(Shutterstock)

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The year is 2020 and Americans have wagered over $22.7 billion at legal U.S. sportsbooks across more than 20 states — including in New York — since the federal ban on sports wagering outside Nevada fell two years ago. But if legal sports betting is so widespread across the U.S., why are offshore sportsbooks operating illegally in the U.S. still getting heaps of attention in mainstream media? And what exactly is wrong with that, if anything?Β 

Perhaps you saw the most recent kerfuffle. Here’s how I think it came about: A publicist for the offshore bookmaker(s) contacts, among others, a sportswriter for the New York Times. The idea is interesting and valid: How will the novel coronavirus pandemic impact sports betting, at a time when pro sports leagues are rebooting in fan-less bubbles, amid mass upheaval and uncertainty? The publicist has knowledgeable sources at the ready to address the questions, and they can deliver comments quickly. The sources are spokespeople or oddsmakers from these offshore sportsbooks, businesses that accept wagers from U.S. bettors in violation of federal law and also state law in many jurisdictions. A writer and editor for the Times, also known as the “Newspaper of Record,” publishes the story, using sources representing these offshore enterprises.Β 

The writer of the recent Times story did not respond to Sports Handle’s email requests for comment.

But based on my own experiences, I am fairly certain that the chain above, leading to publication, closely represents how that story made it to print. And its publication in a paper with a massive worldwide reach drew the outrage of, among others, Joe Asher, CEO for William Hill US, a popular but derided-in-some-corners sportsbook operating legally in a growing number of states from Nevada to Indiana to New Jersey.

It’s really outrageous that the @nytimes would quote and link to offshore sports books. Why would they promote these illegal businesses?

How Does the Coronavirus Affect Sports Betting? https://t.co/FroXWQz7Er

— Joe Asher (@JoeAsher) July 29, 2020

The Times article raises dozens of questions including questions of law, of publicity and public relations, business ethics, journalistic ethics, advertising practices, customer satisfaction, and consumer protection. Many of the questions don’t have good answers yet, and there are far more questions than I could attempt to ask and answer in a readable article.Β Β 

So here I wish to identify five questions, largely focusing on the media aspect. These questions warrant continued discussion and will arise again over and over (possibly in a court of law), as the post-PASPA legal U.S. sports betting industry moves through the terrible twos.

(1) What is the non-legal, practical impact of the New York Times’ usage of insights/quotes from sources at offshore sportsbook(s)?

This is subjective. No doubt the COVID-19/sports betting impact is a valid and newsworthy topic and generated discussion in many other publications. But is the Times’ usage here β€œendorsing” these particular sportsbooks? Publication of comments/accounts from a source is not tantamount to endorsing that source, the source’s organization, or even the truth of the source’s comment or assertions. Indeed, a journalist’s job is to report the unbiased truth, and part of the truth is discussing half-truths and outright lies.Β 

There’s also the issue of linking to the sportsbook’s domains. Is that tantamount to advertising, and therefore illegal, as the American Gaming Association’s Casey Clark insists?Β Β 

The @nytimes egregious marketing of illegal, offshore sportsbooks is shameful at best. Linking to them is akin to advertising their services, which is, of course, illegal.

— Casey Clark (@caseyclarkdc) July 29, 2020

It’s not as clear-cut as he suggests. A link to another publication/comment most often is simply basic attribution, giving credit, or suggesting further, relevant reading. To link to the source website or original reporting is common practice. Now,Β  if there were some sort of kickback arrangement here (very doubtful), or payment for the linking, that would be a different story; no one is alleging that here, to be clear.Β 

How about β€œlegitimized?” That one is tough, because legitimacy may also speak to a sportsbook operator’s functional business practices. When finding quality information sources, does it matter whether or not certain offshore sportsbooks “do” bookmaking better?

Has the Times β€œwhitewashed,” implied the legality of, or suggested that the offshore sportsbooks referenced are actually operating legally in the U.S.? I think that’s closer to the actual practical impact here. But even that is open to debate.Β Β 

ICYMI, @beatingthebook rained πŸ”₯ today on his show. He and @BillKrackman eviscerated many.

Here's one of the clips that VSIN probably doesn't want you to see (more to come): pic.twitter.com/AUoNZlxb7f

— Captain Jack Andrews (@capjack2000) July 30, 2020

(2) What are some legal issues, implications presented here?

The First Amendment affords individuals and news media very broad free-speech protections — for incisive reporting, nuanced opinion, blogging about nonsense, shouting and meme-ing on social media and beyond.Β 

Some have argued that the quoting and linking to offshore sportsbooks is illegal: specifically, that it constitutes aiding and abetting a violation of the Federal Wire Act. Some legal cases such as United States vs. Edge Broadcasting Co., as well as the settlement between The Sporting News and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), have approached similar issues around casino and lottery advertising.

Of course, governmental entities including the DOJ and the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement (DGE) have spoken to and warned of prosecution for certain acts.

Here are relevant sections from a 2003 letter to the National Association of Broadcasters, from John G. Malcolm, deputy assistant attorney general for the DOJ, written as a self-described β€œpublic service”:

Because of the possibility that some of your organization’s members may be accepting money to place such advertisements, the Department of Justice, as a public service, would like you to be aware that the entities and individuals placing these advertisements may be violating various state and federal laws and that entities and individuals that accept and run such advertisements may be aiding and abetting these illegal activities.

Notwithstanding their frequent claims of legitimacy, Internet gambling and offshore sportsbook operations that accept bets from customers in the United States violate Sections 1084, 1952, and 1955 of Title 18 of the United States Code, each of which is a Class E felony. Additionally, pursuant to Title 18. United States Code. Section 2, any person Or entity who aids or abets in the commission of any of the above-listed offenses is punishable as a principal violator of those statutes. The Department of Justice is responsible for enforcing these statutes. and we reserve the right to prosecute violators of the law.Β 

***

Broadcasters and other media outlets should know of the illegality of offshore sportsbook and Internet gambling operations since, presumably, they would not run advertisements for illegal narcotics sales, prostitution, child pornography or other prohibited activities. We’d appreciate it if you would forward this public service message to all of your member organizations which may be running such advertisements, so that they may consult with their counsel or take whatever actions they deem appropriate.Β 

I think it is exceedingly unlikely that what appears in the Times story was anything but news reporting, i.e., not an advertisement for which any remuneration of any kind was involved. But however you define the usage in the article, and in the scores of similar instances across mainstream and local media, meeting the threshold for β€œaiding and abetting” of the Wire Act is a serious hurdle that would require establishing intent to facilitate a violation of the law.

This DOJ letter, from 15 years before a rapidly expanding legal sports betting market was born, was a warning shot. Clearly, the DOJ does not look fondly on the usage; however, there’s a clear demarcation made between advertising and First Amendment speech.Β 

Separately, consider the likelihood of the government prosecuting the party publishing an alleged advertisement, when prosecution of the actual sportsbooks operating illegally is practically non-existent.

More recently, here is an excerpt from a November 2019 letter written by New Jersey DGE Director David Rebuck, β€œto inform news and media outlets and other entities that engage in sportsbook advertising in New Jersey about the importance of not endorsing or referencing internet sportsbook operators that are not authorized to accept wagers from customers located in New Jersey.”

(New Jersey Department of Gaming Enforcement)

The dispatch is most akin to an admonishment from a consumer protection standpoint — or a request for support of the state’s burgeoning legal sports betting market. The point is, it’s well-intentioned, but lacks teeth.Β 

(3) From a journalistic perspective, is there anything unethical about referencing and/or linking these sources?

If the source’s remarks and insight are accurate, valid, truthful, newsworthy, even reasonable, has the journalist not done his or her job, or met ethical expectations? Does a journalist have a responsibility to quote/source/link sportsbooks licensed in U.S. jurisdictions only?Β 

Here is further advice from Rebuck’s November 2019 letter, directed to news and media outlets and other entities β€œengaged in sportsbook advertising in New Jersey”:

β€œIf an unauthorized site must be mentioned in a report, include a statement that theΒ  site is not licensed to provide sports wagering bets in New Jersey, and direct readers to the DGE website that contains the approved list of sports wagering entities and events.”

Has the Times committed any wrongdoing by omitting a statement that neither of the two sportsbooks mentioned holds a license to operate in New York, New Jersey, or anywhere in the U.S.? Is the Times in any way responsible, if a reader in New York, Wisconsin, or anywhere the sportsbooks are not licensed, reads the story and then transacts business with those sportsbook sites? The Times is read literally worldwide, and these sportsbooks, for whatever they might do in the U.S., are licensed in non-U.S. jurisdictions; we’re not talking about The Newark Bugle here.

How proximate is the newspaper reference to someone’s depositing of funds? How much responsibility does Joe Q. Bettor bear in managing his own finances and transactions? These questions don’t have clear answers.Β 

Did the Times fail to vet the sources or those sportsbooks, realize that a β€œ.ag” domain means Antigua, and wonder why, or explore? Was the information itself satisfactory, so in any case, the origin and licensure status of the sportsbook lack relevance?Β 

The CEO of Smarkets and SBK (licensed Colorado sportsbook and a licensed betting exchange in the U.K.), Jason Trost, wrote on Twitter: β€œIIllegal offshore books don’t pay taxes, get software audited, follow responsible betting practice, undergo criminal background checks of staff, etc etc. While a lot of regulation is (very) poorly thought-out, to advocate illegal is better is irresponsible and uninformed.”

But again, is quoting and linking the same as advocating? Have I just advocated for Jason Trost’s Smarkets by quoting his remark on social media? Does taxation have any relevance here whatsoever?

And consider the source(s). At all times. As respected sports wagering industry observer and critic β€˜Captain Jack’ puts it well:

There are no white knights in this industry. Everybody has dirt on their hands.

The "journalist" that cries about offshore makes a living from legal book ads.

The gaming assoc is a lobbyist for the interests of casinos.

The CEO knows offshore is a better product than his.

— Captain Jack Andrews (@capjack2000) July 30, 2020

Time for the disclosure: Sports Handle is owned by Better Collective, a gambling industry affiliate marketing company headquartered in Denmark, with U.S. headquarters in Tennessee. It is monetized in large part by commissions for sending players to U.S.-based sportsbooks. So question my agenda and credibility, too, as I’m sure you already have.

And here’s one more question lacking a clear-cut answer: Does it matter that some U.S.-based legal bookmakers rely on offshore bookmakers to set and adjust their lines, and thus to operate in general? Never mind if they do or don’t, or to what degree — that’s another question of honesty and ethics that exists separately from the law.Β 

(4) Whose responsibility is it to educate media members about sportsbooks operating legally versus illegally in the U.S.?

The journalist who reports on the subject? Her/his editor? The American Gaming Association? The Department of Justice? William Hill U.S.? The National Sports Media Association? The New Jersey DGE and a coalition of other regulatory agencies for states in which sports betting is legal?Β 

How about stakeholders shouting foul on social media? Well, that happens often and may be cathartic or provide a dopamine rush of likes, but does it have any practical value?

Sometimes, public service/education campaigns come by force. In a 2006 case between the DOJ and The Sporting NewsΒ regarding advertisement of illegally operating sportsbooks, The Sporting News was required by the settlement agreement to spend $3 million “to inform and educate said audience that offshore/foreign gambling enterprises conducting, in whole or in part, online or telephonic sports bookmaking and casino-type gambling activities in the United States violate federal and state laws, as do United States-based gamblers using those wagering services.”Β 

Perhaps the lessons weren’t lasting or widespread.Β 

As recently as 2019, FOX Sports’ betting program β€œLock It In” was displaying odds/lines from one of the same offshore sportsbooks referenced in the Times article. In print, you’ll find such references frequently in prominent local, national and international publications such as the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Reuters, Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Washington Post, Indianapolis Star, and far beyond.

Fox using odds from Bet Online dot Antigua. pic.twitter.com/bk3HkXYgs3

— Marc (@MeltzVegas) October 3, 2018

And Barstool Sports as recently as 2018 was sponsor for/partner with an offshore sportsbook of generally ill repute, before Barstool President Dave Portnoy went scorched earth on it after a dispute. Now Penn National, which bought a $165 million stake in Barstool, is just weeks away from rolling out legal Barstool-branded sportsbooks in Pennsylvania and other U.S. markets.Β 

(5) How do offshore sportsbooks penetrate mainstream media so often?

12/ Finally, continue to have the conversation about regulated versus offshore so that people (and media) can understand the differences. It is also important to listen to players and why they believe their needs are better served by offshore market.

— Jennifer Roberts (@JRoVegas) July 30, 2020

The ubiquity of mainstream media quoting offshore sportsbooks, rather than Nevada bookmakers or those representing any sportsbook licensed in the U.S., is in large part a by-product of PASPA’s 26-year run from 1992-2018.Β 

The law created a vacuum that was filled by an enormous offshore and illegal bookmaking industry, through which U.S. residents wagered roughly $150 billion annually. During that time, offshore sportsbooks sought publicity — and found it frequently all across U.S. media.

The sheer volume of illegal betting was accompanied by U.S.-based media articles rooted in betting interest, novelty prop bets (topic for another day), or very basic stories about which team is favored. It makes for good or at least well-read copy for a large audience. Long-standing relationships were made between publicity pros and writers/reporters, establishing two-way communications.Β 

Do PR representatives for legal sportsbooks now need to do a better job engaging with and penetrating media? Well, they are certainly trying and many have been effective. But offshore competitors, which aren’t going away, got a 26-year head start on some of the national U.S. sportsbooks.Β 

Overall, the questions are numerous, and the answers, well, it depends who you ask.Β 

ShareTweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

(Matthew Emmons/USA TODAY)
Features

New Jersey Tries To Put DraftKings Proxy Betting Case In Rearview Mirror

May 26, 2022
DK Slap On Wrist
Regulation

Did DraftKings Receive A Slap On The Wrist In New Jersey Messenger Betting Case?

March 11, 2022
Load More

Top Sportsbooks In Your State

1
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
SugarHouse Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
bet365 Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetRivers Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs ApplyOnly 1x Wager Applies
2
FOX Bet Sportsbook
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
SI Sportsbook
Review / 4.1
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
SuperBook Sports
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetRivers Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs ApplyOnly 1x Wager Applies
1
SI Sportsbook
Review / 4.1
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
Betfred Sportsbook
Review / 3.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetRivers Sportsbook Ontario
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook Ontario
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
NorthStar Bets Sportsbook
Review / 4.6
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Bet99 Sportsbook
Review / 4.7
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Sports Interaction Ontario
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
PowerPlay Sportsbook
Rating / 3.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Monkey Knife Fight
Rating / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
PrizePicks
Rating / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.

State Sports Betting Guides

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
June 27, 2022

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
March 21, 2021

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2022

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
March 18, 2022

Most Read Stories

mattress mack betting charade

Will Everyone Please Stop Calling β€˜Mattress Mack’ A Sports Bettor?

April 27, 2022
Photo: Jasen Vinlove/USA TODAY

Dave Portnoy Says, ‘F**k That Guy,’ To Which Bettor And Gambling Twitter Seriously Object

May 16, 2022
map-missouri

Missouri Sports Betting Bill Draws Debate, Backlash In Senate

May 5, 2022
golden-gate-bridge-san-francisco

California Tribes Won’t Try For Mobile Proposal On 2022 Ballot

May 10, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

gambling therapy
ncpg
igaming ontario
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN),Β 1-800-522-4700Β (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA),Β 1-888-532-3500Β (VA) or call/text TN REDLINEΒ 1-800-889-9789Β (TN).
19+. Please play responsibly. Terms and conditions apply.Β 
Individuals must be 19 years of age or older to participate in igaming in Ontario. Gambling can be addictive, please play responsibly. If you, or someone you know, has a gambling problem in Ontario and wants help, please visit ConnexOntario or call their helpline at 1-866-531-2600. Operators on this website operate pursuant to an Operating Agreement with iGaming Ontario.

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News

Please share your location to continue.

Check our help guide for more info.

share your location