• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

PASPA Ruling Revisited In Law Prof’s Essay

Sports law professor suggests flaw was never remedied in case that vastly expanded sports betting

John Brennan by John Brennan
March 1, 2022
in Legal, Sports
Shutterstock

Shutterstock

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

There was a particularly curious aspect — at the conclusion of an even more curious court ruling — resulting from the lawsuit filed by five major sports leagues against Monmouth Park’s effort to launch Las Vegas-style sports betting at the New Jersey racetrack in 2014.

And that aspect, Florida State University sports law professor Ryan Rodenberg wrote in an 11-page essay published by the Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport last week, may cause legal headaches for years to come.

On Oct. 24, 2014, U.S. District Court Judge Michael Shipp issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) against the New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, which runs Monmouth Park, to prevent any sports betting while Shipp deliberated on a permanent ruling about its legality.

Shipp somehow concluded that the NFL, NCAA, NBA, NHL, and MLB would suffer “irreparable harm” if a single Jersey Shore racetrack was permitted for a period of up to 30 days to offer the same gambling that dozens of Las Vegas casinos have offered for more than a half-century.

The proliferation of sports betting now in more than half of U.S. states allowing for such gambling — after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in 2018 allowed for such an expansion — has not, in fact, resulted in any discernible damage to any of the sports organizations.

The 2014 hearing took place with Shipp and a few media members present in a Trenton courthouse, and with attorneys for the plaintiff sports organizations and all relevant parties participating via teleconference.

After Shipp’s order, Ron Riccio — an attorney for the horsemen — commented to the judge, “I was unclear whether the scope of your injunction is limited to the plaintiffs’ games, and not other sporting contests that the plaintiffs have no interest in.”

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

Shipp replied, “Well, right now the only — the scope is limited to the application that’s been before the court, which is limited to plaintiffs’ games.”

Riccio said: “That was the clarification I was seeking. Thank you, your honor.”

Reversal of fortune

The last comment by Shipp was significant, because it would have allowed the New Jersey horsemen to offer bets on sports such as professional golf, tennis, soccer, boxing, mixed martial arts, and motorsports like NASCAR and Grand Prix racing.

But a few hours after the comment, Shipp produced an addendum to his order “upon further consideration” of Riccio’s question.

And just like that, the TRO was broadened to further prohibit betting “on one or more competitive games in which amateur and professional athletes participate.”

Meaning, Monmouth Park visitors would not have the chance to bet on any sports at all.

“By allowing standing-less plaintiffs to obtain an overbroad injunction against a sitting state governor, the decision represents a dubious vehicle for generating lasting precedent on anti-commandeering grounds,” Rodenberg wrote, referring to the top court’s eventual ruling against PASPA’s requirement that states do the federal government’s bidding in preventing sports betting.

The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, which New Jersey’s sports betting law sought to counter, had many questionable legal aspects — so much so that the U.S. Department of Justice itself had found it “particularly troubling” that the bill would deputize sports leagues to file a lawsuit independent of governmental action.

U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa noted at the time, “The Federal Government has never authorized private parties to enforce such restrictions against the States. This legislation would do so.”

The concerns of the DOJ and Grassley were validated by the May 14, 2018, Supreme Court ruling. But Rodenberg’s point is that the court, in overturning PASPA, didn’t go far enough.

Leagues were granted broad power

It’s noteworthy that the five sports organizations did not ask for relief beyond their own games. Rodenberg points to a motion earlier in 2012 which read in part: “If New Jersey had singled out the World Series for state-sponsored gambling, then only Major League Baseball could sue.”

In 2013, a plaintiffs’ brief explained, “It’s not like the NFL can bring a claim about NBA, gambling on NBA. It’s very specific to their legal entitlement to protect their [own] product.”

And in 2017, a Department of Justice brief in the case declared that PASPA only “authorizes sports leagues to seek injunctions against violations involving their games.”

But the “across-the-board injunction” by Shipp, Rodenberg asserts, means, “The Plaintiff Leagues and other sports organizations will now likely point to the ruling as a de facto grant of a sports betting property right.”

Rodenberg calls it “a twisted irony” that the leagues spent six years in court battling to maintain PASPA — even though the lawmakers who passed it specifically noted, in a 1991 Senate report, that the leagues “are clearly prohibited under this bill from instituting their own sports betting scheme.”

Yet, since the fall of PASPA, numerous sports franchises have obtained their own sports betting licenses.

What should have happened?

Rodenberg writes: “The Supreme Court should have followed a simpler non-constitutional track and addressed the defect early on, instead of allowing it to fester and persist.

“But the Supreme Court ignored the optimal path, and sports betting legalization in the United States is left with the wreckage. … Both the Supreme Court and appellate court had years to cure the defect.”

The result, Rodenberg projects, is, “If one sports league — or a quintet like in the Supreme Court sports betting case — does not like a new state law, the league will likely claim a property interest over sports betting and seek to block the state statute.”

Rodenberg concludes, “The real winners of the Supreme Court sports betting case are the five sports league plaintiffs … that ‘lost’ the case.”

That’s because the court ruling “disposed of a constraint that PASPA had long held over the heads of revenue-motivated sports leagues” by preventing them from benefiting financially from sports wagering.

Rodenberg predicts the result may well be that the leagues “will soon emerge as full-blown direct competitors bent on putting licensed sportsbook operators out of business.”

ShareTweetShare
John Brennan

John Brennan

John Brennan has covered NJ and NY sports business and gaming since 2002 and was a Pulitzer Prize Finalist in 2008, while reporting for The Bergen County Record.

Related Posts

get a grip graphic
Industry

Get A Grip β€” The Week In Sports Betting: Five Years And Counting

May 12, 2023
paspa ruling
Features

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

colts logo

Source: ‘Pervasive’ Wagering From Colts Player Includes Bets On His Own Team

June 5, 2023
paspa ruling

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
inside-fanatics-sportsbook-fedex-field

Sources: Fanatics Enters Advanced Talks With PointsBet On Transformative U.S. Deal

May 12, 2023
new york times headquarters

The ‘Risky Wager’ Series From New York Times Was No Hit Piece β€” It’s Reality

May 31, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
May 16, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
May 2, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
April 24, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
May 3, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News