• About Us / Contact
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Recency Bias: It’s Real, Unspectacular, And Sportsbooks Use It Against Bettors

At least that's the TL;DR takeaway from a recent academic paper studying the phenomenon

Jeff Edelstein by Jeff Edelstein
June 23, 2021
in Features
recency bias

{Shutterstock}

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Pssst: Here’s your mortal lock big kahuna once-in-a-lifetime mortgage the house slam dunk home run guaranteed victory bet of the year: Next time an NFL team that has won and covered the spread over the course of the last three weeks takes the field against a team without its starting quarterback …

β€œThis is the fourth paper I’ve worked on looking at the NFL gambling market, and the first time I brought in my co-authors,” said Corey Shank, an assistant clinical professor of finance at the Farmer School of Business at Miami University. He teamed up with Robert Durand, a professor of finance at Curtin University in Australia and Fernando Patterson, an assistant professor of finance at North Carolina Central University, for their paper, Behavioral Biases in the NFL Gambling Market: Overreaction to News and the Recency Bias.

Here’s the TL;DR version of the paper: Football bettors overreact to recency bias in NFL markets. And while this sounds about right to anyone who bets on sports, the paper went a little bit further to posit the following: The sportsbooks are using recency bias to encourage bets to what they perceive will be the β€œlosing” side. In other words: Forget the trying to balance both sides of the ledger to claim that 10% vig; the books, when they can, are actively using recency bias to get bettors where they want them.

β€œDue to the vig, the sportsbook has a guaranteed profit if they get an equal amount on each side of the bet,” Shank noted. β€œBut what most gamblers don’t realize is that sportsbooks don’t do that. A few papers I wrote, and a few others written by others, have come very close to showing a lot of support for the idea that sportsbooks can use their expertise to set the lines to make even more money than the vig.”

And in this paper, Shank and company came even closer to cracking the code.

β€œWhat we do in this paper is actually show that because gamblers overreact to the outcomes of the last few weeks, the sportsbook can shift the spread a little bit to make even more money than having 50/50 on each side of the bet,” he said.

Bet the dog in this example

But first, backing up to the original portion of the program: What to do when a team comes in hot and is playing against a second string quarterback.

According to Shank’s research, you should take the points and bet the underdog every time. Not because they’re going to win — their research shows quite the opposite, that anytime the second string quarterback takes the field, the odds of winning go south — but because over time, the underdog is going to cover the spread more often than not.

β€œOver all the situations, the team that lost their quarterback covers the spread a lot more often,” Shank said. β€œAnything can happen in any one game, but if you had 100 situations, you’d make more money betting on that team no one wants to bet on.”

Furthermore, the research showed bettors were 2.1% less likely to bet on the home team when their first string quarterback was out, and 3.1% more likely to bet on the home team when the visiting quarterback was a backup. These are both consistent with the recency bias theory.

Shank, Durand, and Patterson kept going further, finding that for each previous game the home team covered the spread, bettors were 1.51% more likely to bet on them. And the more points they covered by in recent weeks, the more likely people were to bet on them. This worked in reverse as well; don’t cover the spread, and watch bettors stay away.

And this is all Shank and his co-authors set out to do: To show that recency bias is real, and that bettors will overestimate prior wins and losses, as well as put too much stock in who is behind center.

The reason for the research — in case Shank’s department chair is poking around here — is to take how people bet on sports and apply it to how people invest in the stock market in an effort to educate investors on what not to do. In this case, what β€œnot to do” is depend too heavily on what a stock has done in the short-term.

Each bull market brings in myriad of amateur investors and traders.

Owing to recency bias, they think markets only go up and hence come without an exit plan.

One may get lucky a time or two, but in long run they’ll be slaughtered! pic.twitter.com/Bw6lIK6RlS

— Divyang Vyas (@divyaangvyas) June 17, 2021

β€œThe gambling market is a way to overcome some limitations in studying finance, to see if we still see the same types of behavior in this market,” Shank said. β€œIf you’re buying a stock, we can have data on people that purchase stocks, but it’s impossible to know what they were thinking when they purchased it. Are they trying to purchase this for a week, a month, a year, or 20 years? That’s not something we can ever know when they purchase it. We don’t know what they’re looking for. What’s their expected return? These are pretty big limitations, so we have to make assumptions when looking at investors’ portfolios.

β€œBut when we’re looking at a single bet it’s really easy,” Shank continued. β€œThis football game starts Sunday at 1 p.m., it’s over at 4 p.m. We also knowΒ  if you bet $110, you either come out with $100 or lose $110. We know exactly what the possible outcomes are. We can use the sports betting market as a proxy.”

And the results of the study confirmed the hypothesis.

β€œPeople tend to overreact to things that happen most recently rather than looking at long term trends,” he said.

The dangerous effects of recency bias are amplified by the fact that many real-world systems are mean-reverting. This sets up for large forecasting errors, as people are systematically most confident (due to recent results) right before a reversion event.

— Robert Martin (@robertmartin88) June 22, 2021

And that would’ve been enough for a paper. But their research teased at something else: That sportsbooks are actively using recency bias against bettors.Β 

Sportsbooks know more

OK: This is where having a finance degree would certainly come in handy, but for the sake of simplicity, know this: Shank’s paper shows that bookmakers earn higher returns when gamblers succumb to recency bias — and his theory is that the bookmakers know it.

As an example: Imagine if the Cleveland Browns are on a three-game heater, covering the spread each time. And let’s further say they’re playing host to Dak Prescott-less Dallas Cowboys. The Browns are certainly going to be favored. No one is going to want to be Dallas due to recency bias and the fact they’re down to Garrett Gilbert at QB. (Sorry, Gar.)

According to Shank’s research, the bookmakers are going to goose the Browns number higher. Instead of, say, Cleveland giving 10 points — which may be the β€œtrue” spread — the books will set it at -15, knowing full well that recency bias is going to push bettors to the Browns. Shank is supposing the sportsbooks are not, in this case, looking for anything near a 50/50 split on the bets; they want bettors to keep smashing the Browns.

β€œEven though it should be 10, everyone is still buying at 15, so maybe the books get 55 or 60 percent on the Browns and make extra profit due to bettors’ irrational behavior,” Shank said. β€œSportsbooks are always trying to push you in one direction of the bet. And for the most part, they’re going to win when they push you on the wrong side. They’re trying to maximize their profit.”

The paper doesn’t go all the way confirming this; it just appears so based on the data Shank uncovered. And he’s not the first researcher to posit such an idea; it goes back in academic literature to 2004 paper written by Freakonomics author Steven Levitt.

As a result, this is the next paper Shank is working on, setting out to prove what many of us probably assume: That the sportsbooks are a lot better than the gamblers, and that the lines are designed to maximize profits at every turn, not to just to take the vig.

β€œJust because the spread says -10 doesn’t mean that’s what it should be,” Shank said. β€œLevitt was one of the first people to suggest that, a few other papers have kind of supported it, but it’s never been shown that, yes, the sportsbooks know more and are actively trying to push bettors to a side. I’m in the early stages of that research.”

ShareTweetShare
Jeff Edelstein

Jeff Edelstein

Jeff is a veteran journalist, working as a columnist for The Trentonian newspaper in Trenton, NJ for a number of years. He's also an avid sports bettor and DFS player. He can be reached at jedelstein@bettercollective.com.

Related Posts

NFL parlay bets and parlay tickets that have cashed for a lot of money
Sports

Parlay Bets That Overcame Long Odds and Paid Big

June 7, 2022
fanatics-tags-jerseys
Features

Fanatics Is Coming To Play, But When, Where, And How?

June 2, 2022
Load More

Top Sportsbooks In Your State

1
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
SugarHouse Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
bet365 Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetRivers Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs ApplyOnly 1x Wager Applies
2
FOX Bet Sportsbook
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
SI Sportsbook
Review / 4.1
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
SuperBook Sports
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
BetRivers Sportsbook
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs ApplyOnly 1x Wager Applies
1
SI Sportsbook
Review / 4.1
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
FanDuel Sportsbook
Review / 4.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Caesars Sportsbook
Review / 4.4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
WynnBET Sportsbook
Review / 4
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
Betfred Sportsbook
Review / 3.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
BetRivers Sportsbook Ontario
Review / 4.3
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
BetMGM Sportsbook Ontario
Review / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
NorthStar Bets Sportsbook
Review / 4.6
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Bet99 Sportsbook
Review / 4.7
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
Sports Interaction Ontario
Review / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
3
PowerPlay Sportsbook
Rating / 3.8
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
1
Monkey Knife Fight
Rating / 4.5
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.
2
PrizePicks
Rating / 4.2
BET NOW
T&Cs Apply21+. Eligibility restrictions apply. See website for details.

State Sports Betting Guides

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
June 24, 2022

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
March 21, 2021

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2022

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
March 18, 2022

Most Read Stories

mattress mack betting charade

Will Everyone Please Stop Calling β€˜Mattress Mack’ A Sports Bettor?

April 27, 2022
Photo: Jasen Vinlove/USA TODAY

Dave Portnoy Says, ‘F**k That Guy,’ To Which Bettor And Gambling Twitter Seriously Object

May 16, 2022
map-missouri

Missouri Sports Betting Bill Draws Debate, Backlash In Senate

May 5, 2022
golden-gate-bridge-san-francisco

California Tribes Won’t Try For Mobile Proposal On 2022 Ballot

May 10, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

gambling therapy
ncpg
igaming ontario
If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, crisis counseling and referral services can be accessed by calling 1-800-GAMBLER (1-800-426-2537) (IL). Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ/WV/PA/MI), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN),Β 1-800-522-4700Β (CO), 1-800-BETS OFF (IA),Β 1-888-532-3500Β (VA) or call/text TN REDLINEΒ 1-800-889-9789Β (TN).
19+. Please play responsibly. Terms and conditions apply.Β 
Individuals must be 19 years of age or older to participate in igaming in Ontario. Gambling can be addictive, please play responsibly. If you, or someone you know, has a gambling problem in Ontario and wants help, please visit ConnexOntario or call their helpline at 1-866-531-2600. Operators on this website operate pursuant to an Operating Agreement with iGaming Ontario.

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona Sports Betting
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • Ohio Sports Betting
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia Sports Betting
    • Massachusetts Sports Betting
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Guide To ‘Risk-Free’ Bets
    • Common Beginner Mistakes
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
    • Partnership Tracker
  • News

Please share your location to continue.

Check our help guide for more info.

share your location