• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Sports Betting Proves A Hot Topic At Sloan Analytics Conference

Eric Raskin by Eric Raskin
March 4, 2019
in Industry
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

One day before the subject of sports betting got its own panel at the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference in Boston, it was already driving the conversation. NFL COO Maryann Turcke declared at the very first panel of the day on Friday, ostensibly about building data-driven organizations, that sports betting will β€œchange everything” in terms of the way fans consume and engage with sports.

Turcke is almost certainly right. But her tense needs updating. Sports betting is changing the equation already.

Saturday morning’s β€œSkin In The Game: Sports Gambling’s Emergence In The U.S.” panel was unique in that, for the first time at Sloan, legal sports betting on a widespread level in America was treated as a reality of the moment, not a distant β€œif/then” proposition.

Sure, there was plenty of focus on the future; moderator Jeff Ma, of MIT blackjack team fame, kicked off the conversation by asking what the experts thought the sports betting industry will look like in 20 years. But for the most part, the panelists β€” William Hill CMO Sharon Otterman, Perform CCO Andrew Ashenden, ESPN broadcaster Doug Kezirian, FanDuel Group President and COO Kip Levin, and Sportradar U.S. President Matteo Monteverdi β€” focused on the here and now of a business that has been on a steep trajectory since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned PASPA less than 10 months ago.

Here are some of the notable topics and most compelling insights from the hour-long roundtable:

Get online or get lost

Thee first two words out of every panelist’s mouth when asked which states are doing sports betting right were β€œNew” and β€œJersey.” And if you know anything about the early days of regulated sports betting in NJ, you know almost all of the growth is on the online/mobile side.

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

β€œMississippi is only retail,” Monteverde pointed out. β€œClearly that limits dramatically the adoption. To see this business growing, you need to see the mobile regulated.”

Levin added that if part of the point of regulating sports wagering is to steer bettors away from the black market, allowing mobile is essential. β€œIf it’s going to go … retail only,” Levin said, β€œit’s going to take a long time to convert those customers over.”

But even the betting set-up in New Jersey could be more progressive, Ma suggested, as he scoffed at the notion of needing a land-based partner to offer mobile betting. β€œImagine you couldn’t set up an eCommerce site unless you had a physical store,” the moderator chimed in.

Otterman, as was the case at various points throughout the hour, played the role of semi-contrarian: β€œI think the magic is going to be a combination of online and retail,” she said.

Minimizing the β€˜friction’

Following on Levin’s point about it being nearly impossible to squeeze out the black market if mobile betting isn’t legal in more states, there was a fair bit of talk about points of β€œfriction” found in the early days of regulated betting. β€œThe more friction that regulators put in the system,” Ma said, β€œthe much smaller chance that this is ever going to really replace the black market.”

Levin noted that payment processing is a huge point of friction right now, but he believes that will get better over time.

Then there’s taxation, which varies wildly from state to state.

β€œStates like Pennsylvania where the tax rate is so high, it’s really hard to compete against the illegal market,” Otterman opined. β€œWe want to compete on a level playing field because we want to keep consumers safe.”

Everybody’s two favorite words: integrity fees

We hope you had β€œintegrity fees” somewhere on your Bingo card coming into the panel. Those dirty words to describe the sports leagues getting a cut of the handle or the revenue popped up a couple of times, and were referenced as one of the sources of the aforementioned friction.

The good news for those of us who’d like to see the term β€œintegrity fee” fade from the discussion permanently is that at the panel it was frequently accompanied by the word β€œsilly.”

β€œIt is silly, the tax,” Monteverdi insisted. But then he clarified: β€œIt’s not silly that the leagues should have integrity programs.”

In-game betting taking off

The ability to make and take wagers during the game, whether on an individual play/point/inning/period or on real-time-updated odds for an end-of-contest bet, is central to industry growth, everyone on the panel agreed.

β€œWe’re already seeing north of 50% of handle on NBA games in-play,” Levin cited regarding FanDuel Sportsbook.

In-game betting is particularly important for baseball, Kezirian said, because it couples nicely with sitting down, having a beer, and watching an inning or two rather than committing to watching an entire three-hour game to sweat your bet.

In addressing Ma’s opening question about what the landscape will look like in 20 years, Ashenden went straight to in-game betting, saying that the European models indicate it will just become more and more prevalent.

For love or money?

The most contentious topic of the panel spun out of a question of whether it’s money or entertainment that fuels most bettors. William Hill has come under fire for limiting or even banning β€œsharps” who’ve had success, putting Otterman on the defensive somewhat as she directed the conversation toward the company’s emphasis on recreational bettors.

Otterman disputed the assertion that William Hill doesn’t welcome winning bettors. She said, essentially, that the rumors aren’t true, saying of the publicized claims, β€œWe were picked on a little bit because we’re the largest bookmaker in Nevada.”

But moderator Ma was persistent in gently and respectfully pushing back. β€œIt’s too hard to get money down if you’re winning,” he said. β€œI had hope that legalization would change that, but I’m not sure if it will.”

For what it’s worth, Levin said that FanDuel regularly surveys new customers and is receiving positive news about conversions of both casual and serious bettors. β€œThe percentage of people who have never bet before is growing,” he said, β€œand the percentage of people who have bet with an offshore book is growing.”

The rising (crimson) tide of PR stunts

FanDuel got its share of attention in December when it paid out futures bets on Alabama to win the NCAA football championship a month before the results were in. Ma asked Levin if the gambit, which FanDuel said at the time would cost it about $400,000, paid off.

β€œIt worked out as we had actually hoped, because it created this big story and buzz, we got a ton of PR,” Levin said. β€œAnd then [Alabama] lost … and it became another story again.”

Ma countered that paying out β€œseems ridiculous,” saying treating losing bets as winners gives FanDuel’s business β€œzero credibility.” But Levin insisted it was worth it and that they did a careful analysis of what they stood to lose β€” and he admitted they decided on the payout plan at the time they did in part because the book hadn’t seen a heavy rush of futures volume on Alabama yet.

Off-the-beaten-path betting

In the wake of Major League Baseball trying to stifle betting on spring training games, as well as a mildly controversial first year of legal Oscars betting in New Jersey, the idea of less traditional betting markets was examined by the panel.

Kezirian said he understands where MLB is coming from with regard to betting on exhibition games. The host of the upcoming ESPN show Daily Wager emphasized that leagues need to be cautious and do their due diligence, and always explore β€œworst-case scenarios.”

As for Oscars betting, Levin said FanDuel had no expectation about being able to take bets on the awards before the New Jersey Division of Gaming Enforcement suddenly said they could. And even then, he said, interest from bettors was modest.

β€œIt’s not a huge business opportunity,” Levin said. β€œIt’s more about doing something different, getting the PR value, and making people aware.”

ShareTweetShare
Eric Raskin

Eric Raskin

Eric is a veteran writer, editor, and podcaster in the sports and gaming industries. He was the editor-in-chief of the poker magazine All In for nearly a decade, is the author of the book The Moneymaker Effect, and has contributed to such outlets as ESPN.com, Grantland.com, and Playboy. Contact Eric at [email protected]

Related Posts

fanatics promo code design with pete alonso of mets
Promotions

Fanatics Sportsbook Beta Offer Earns $200 All Week in Maryland, Massachusetts, TN & Ohio

June 6, 2023
nascar-race-charlotte-north-carolina
Legislation

North Carolina Mobile Betting Bill Nears Final House Concurrence

June 6, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

colts logo

Source: ‘Pervasive’ Wagering From Colts Player Includes Bets On His Own Team

June 5, 2023
paspa ruling

From PASPA To Present: An Oral History Of The U.S. Sports Betting Gold Rush

May 11, 2023
inside-fanatics-sportsbook-fedex-field

Sources: Fanatics Enters Advanced Talks With PointsBet On Transformative U.S. Deal

May 12, 2023
new york times headquarters

The ‘Risky Wager’ Series From New York Times Was No Hit Piece β€” It’s Reality

May 31, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
May 16, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
May 2, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
April 24, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
May 3, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Vermont
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News