• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Colorado
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetMGM Bonus Code
    • Bet365 Bonus Code
    • Caesars Sportsbook Promo Code
    • ESPN BET Promo Code
    • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetRivers Promo Code
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Colorado
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetMGM Bonus Code
    • Bet365 Bonus Code
    • Caesars Sportsbook Promo Code
    • ESPN BET Promo Code
    • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetRivers Promo Code
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

What If One League Wants Sports Betting When Other Leagues Do Not?

Ryan Rodenberg by Ryan Rodenberg
January 23, 2018
in Industry, Regulation
New Jersey was barred from permitting wagering on professional golf, tennis, soccer, race car driving, or mixed martial arts -- without the UFC, NASCAR, Major League Soccer, or other leagues ever being heard by the judge. More at SportsHandle.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Forget sports betting β€œcarve-outs,” a mechanism the NCAA recently floated to remove its games from consideration, leaving professional games on the sports betting menu. The carve-out is old news.

The timelier discussionβ€”especially with the partial federal sports betting ban contained in the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA) still on the books pending review by the Supreme Courtβ€”is whether a specific sports league could β€œcarve-in” under PASPA to allow wagering on that league’s games. Β 

Consider the following question: Why can’t New Jersey permit casinos and racetracks in the state to take bets on golf, tennis, soccer, race car driving, or mixed martial arts?

Answer: Because a PASPA lawsuit against the state was filed by a hockey league, basketball association, football league, baseball office, and college sports association.

β€˜Carving’ up the federal sports betting ban in New Jersey, Indiana, and other states

What If One League Wants Sports Betting When Other Leagues Do Not?

Having one sports leagueβ€”or fiveβ€”suing to get a one-size-fits-all injunction impacting another league results in a huge disconnect, especially when the UFC disagrees with the NCAA’s position on sports gambling.

And the disconnect casts a shadow over the right of a sports league not to be part of broad injunction that attaches to all sports, even those sports unconnected to the leagues who opt to file PASPA lawsuits against states such as New Jersey.

Sign Up For The Sports Handle Newsletter!
I also want to receive information and offers about online sportsbooks (eg. odds boost, welcome offers)

Enter the nascent concept of a sports betting β€œcarve-in,” an idea that moved into the mainstream earlier this month when a lawmaker from Indiana introduced legislation providing a de facto carve-in for certain college sporting events tethered to television contracts. Β Β Β Β 

Sports betting carve-outs for specific sporting events and certain states have long historical anchors.

In 1976, a report submitted to Congress reached a definitive conclusion on the topic.

β€œIn the event that a State does legalize sports wagering it should incorporate into its enabling legislation a prohibition against wagering on amateur sporting events,” wrote the Commission on the Review of the National Policy Toward Gambling in its 212 page report. Β 

In PASPAβ€”the 1992 federal law currently under review by the Supreme Courtβ€”Congress inserted a carve-out for Nevada and a handful of other states, exempting the states from PASPA’s grasp.

The idea of carve-outs has cropped up more recently too.

Mark Emmert

Last month, NCAA executive Mark Emmert suggested that the organization he leads would seek a carve-out for college sports if PASPA is invalidated by the Supreme Court.

And earlier this month, legislation was introduced in Indiana providing sports leagues with a carve-out.

β€œ[A] sports governing body may at its election notify the commission that it desires to restrict or limit wagering on a sporting event conducted by the governing body to ensure the integrity of contests,” wrote authors of the bill. Β The draft bill was introduced after input from the NBA and Major League Baseball.

Enter sports betting β€˜carve-ins’

The idea of a β€œcarve-in” for sports betting has a much shorter tail. Β 

Representative Alan Morrison’s new draft bill in Indiana also included a specific opt-in for certain college games on television. Β In relevant part, here is was Representative Morrison’s bill says:

β€œWagering on the following sporting events may not be restricted: … [a] sporting event conducted by member institutions competing in the top level of intercollegiate athletics in accordance with a television contract.”

The Indiana bill is preliminary and would only come into existence if the Supreme Court strikes down PASPA, but it is easy to envision an otherwise untelevised Wednesday night mid-major college football match-up being strategically positioned as an eyeball-grabbing betting event designated under the Indiana law and other state laws with similar language.

PASPA in the future

But what if PASPA remains on the books after the Supreme Court issues its decision in the New Jersey case?

If the five sports leagues who filed suit against New Jersey Governor Chris Christieβ€”the NCAA, NHL, NBA, NFL, and Major League Baseballβ€”win the Supreme Court case, then PASPA lives to see another day.

What If One League Wants Sports Betting When Other Leagues Do Not?
Inside the Supreme Court during Christie v NCAA oral argument

 

Also, if New Jersey were to win a narrow statutory victory with a majority of the justices ruling that the Garden State’s β€œpartial repeal” complies with PASPA, then the federal sports betting ban would remain good law.

In other words, a sports league seeking β€œprotection” under PASPA and alleging irreparable harm from state-sponsored sports betting could look to PASPA again. Β For example, the lawyer for the NCAA, NHL, NBA, NFL, and Major League Baseball alluded to sports gambling as a β€œcancer” during last month’s Supreme Court oral argument.

And, following the lead of the quintet of sports leagues who sued New Jersey (twice) and Delaware (once), a future sports league purporting to oppose legalized sports gambling could seek a blanket injunction in some other state in order to shut down any sports wagering the league disapproves. Β 

Sowing the seeds for a sports betting carve-in

During the early stages of the case now under review by the Supreme Court, District Court Judge Michael Shipp issued an injunction against New Jersey.

β€œ[T]he scope [of the injunction] is limited to the application that’s been put before the Court which is limited to the plaintiff’s games,” said Judge Shipp during an October 2014 hearing.

Hours later, however, Judge Shipp reversed course.

β€œThe scope of restraints is NOT limited to the games sponsored by the plaintiffs’ leagues,” wrote Judge Shipp, overruling himself.

The result?

The five leagues who filed the lawsuit obtained an injunction that attached to both sporting events they are connected with and sporting events with which they are wholly unconnected.

New Jersey was then barred from permitting wagering on professional golf, tennis, soccer, race car driving, or mixed martial arts.

And all of this happened without the UFC, NASCAR, Major League Soccer, or other leagues ever being heard by the judge.

Major League Soccer commissioner Don Garber supports legal, regulated sports betting

Rebutting the universal PASPA injunction

The β€œentitlement” to bring a lawsuitβ€”or notβ€”has garnered attention of late.

β€œSuch entitlements ordinarily include, at a minimum, the right not to assert a claim in litigation and the corresponding right not to have someone else assert that claim without the claimholder’s consent,” wrote professor Ryan Williams in an influential Columbia Law Review article published in 2015.

So, hypothetically, could the UFC or some other sports league have intervened in the New Jersey case if such a league disapproved of how the injunction was applied to non-litigants?

Maybe. Β But it is probably too late now. Β 

However, the next PASPA lawsuit, if there is one, could see a carve-in attempt by one league to repel the efforts of another league seeking to further the federal ban on sports betting.

And, in a legal twist, one or more of the potential leagues looking to carve-in down the roadβ€”as a way to monetize legalized sports bettingβ€”could be one of the same sports leagues who sued New Jersey in the current Supreme Court PASPA case.


Ryan Rodenberg works as a professor, researcher, and writer. He’s onΒ Twitter @sportslawprof.


Also Check Out From SportsHandle:

Waiting for Sports Betting at The United States Supreme Court

Congress, A Crystal Ball, And the β€˜Controversy’ Over Sports Betting

Indiana Sports Betting Bill Contains Bombshell β€˜Integrity Fee’ Provision for Leagues

Share1TweetShare
Ryan Rodenberg

Ryan Rodenberg

Ryan Rodenberg works as a professor, researcher, and writer.

This site contains commercial content. We may be compensated for the links provided on this page. The content on this page is for informational purposes only.

Related Posts

US clears $250 billion all-time handle
Industry

U.S. Commercial Sports Wagering Handle Surpasses $250 Billion Post-PASPA

August 23, 2023
ncaa-championship-trophy
Politics

Report: NCAA Has Found 175 Sports Wagering Violations Since 2018

July 13, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

guitar-hotel-hard-rock-florida

Court Decision Clears Way For Hard Rock Bet To Launch In Florida … But Will It?

September 28, 2023
system error

Schuetz: Palpable Errors In Sports Betting, And The Palpably Bad Decisions That Follow

September 25, 2023
taylor swift donna kelce

Will Taylor Swift-Travis Kelce Relationship Make Sports Bettors Out Of More Women?

September 28, 2023
have-a-game-plan-bet-responsibly-screenshot

Bettors Know All About Responsible Gambling, But Most Don’t Use Tools

September 12, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Sports Betting in Kentucky

Kentucky Sports Betting – Welcome Offers & Best Legal Sportsbook Apps for 2023

by Dukes Wooters
September 28, 2023

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – All Online Sportsbooks, Bonus Offers, and News 2023

by Brian Pempus
September 29, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
September 6, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
September 1, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
September 6, 2023

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps 2023

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Lottery
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Colorado
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Kentucky
    • Louisiana
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • New Jersey
    • New York
    • North Carolina
    • Ohio
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetMGM Bonus Code
    • Bet365 Bonus Code
    • Caesars Sportsbook Promo Code
    • ESPN BET Promo Code
    • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo Code
    • BetRivers Promo Code
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News