U.S. Sports Betting — Where It’s Legal And Where It’s Coming Soon

The availability of legal online and retail sports betting is increasing in the United States. This is cause for celebration for Americans interested in safe, legal sports betting options.

Las Vegas, Nevada is the sports betting mecca and will remain so, but fortunately over a dozen states have legalized sports betting since the United States Supreme Court struck the federal ban on sports wagering in May 2018. At Sports Handle we deliver sports betting news with original reporting; industry coverage, analysis and opinion, betting guides, sportsbook reviews, and more.

If or when legal sports betting comes to your state, we’ll have you covered on everything you need to know about state-licensed sportsbooks and legal U.S. sports betting sites. For now, the sections below provide an extensive history of sports betting in the U.S., along with a state-by-state breakdown of the current legal status of sports betting, relevant industry stakeholders, and links to a bevy of educational resources.

Is sports betting legal in my state?

The number of legal US sports betting states is growing incrementally and rather quickly. Some states’ legislative sessions conclude early in the year, while others last year round. There are “special sessions” too, which means that new states may legalize at various points throughout the year.

As of August 2019, the number of states (or jurisdictions) that allow full-fledged legal sports betting — in some form — is now 10.

The states that have active legal sports betting or have legalized with operations yet to commence are (and more on the particulars of each market in each of these states below):

  1. Arkansas
  2. Delaware
  3. Illinois
  4. Iowa
  5. Indiana
  6. Mississippi
  7. Montana
  8. New Hampshire
  9. New Jersey
  10. New Mexico
  11. Nevada
  12. New York
  13. Oregon
  14. Pennsylvania
  15. Rhode Island
  16. Tennessee
  17. Washington, D.C.
  18. West Virginia

Here is a link to our full bill tracker.

If you don’t yet have access to a legal online sportsbook, check out Monkey Knife Fight, a prop betting platform that’s available in 31 states. Our sister site, RotoGrinders, is offering a fantastic welcome package — just use its Monkey Knife Fight promo code to get an exclusive bonus.

Other states with decent chance to “go” soon

Some states have held numerous committee hearings about whether and how to legalize sports wagering. Some have made a lot of progress, others are mired in various disagreements — between stakeholders and lawmakers.

The list of states that are poised to legalize sports wagering soon — meaning in 2019 or 2020 — with or without mobile/online sports betting options, include:

  1. Connecticut
  2. Maine
  3. Massachusetts
  4. Missouri
  5. Michigan
  6. Ohio

Of course, there may be surprises, like Tennessee was, and there may be some that surprisingly don’t get it done even though there’s lots of legal gambling already permitted in the state.

Market breakdown

The following section provides a glance at the markets:

  1. In states that have legalized sports betting and where operations are live; and
  2. In states that legalized where operations are pending/forthcoming.

Legal and operations up and running:

Arkansas

  • Market launch date: July 2019
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: One (1) so far — at Oaklawn Racing Casino Resort in Hot Springs.
  • Online: No — not yet legal.
  • Notes: The state legalized through a ballot referendum in Nov. 2018 that authorized four casinos in the state — two at existing racetracks and two new ones. So far the market is very limited. The sportsbook at Oaklawn is powered by SB Tech.

Delaware

  • Market launch date: June 2018
  • Number of land-based books in state: Three (3) — at Delaware Park Casino, Dover Downs and Harrington Raceway & Casino.
  • Online: Although state officials believe existing law permits online wagering, no online sportsbooks are yet approved or available.
  • Notes: The Delaware Lottery currently operates and has jurisdiction over sports betting. The Lottery has agreements with both Scientific Games and William Hill to manage its sports betting systems. In accordance with pre-existing (or pre-PASPA) rules, Delaware residents can also make parlay wagers (3 legs or more) on NFL contests at retail/convenience store locations throughout the state.

Mississippi

  • Market launch date: August 2018
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: 28 — both commercial and tribal.
  • Online: Only on-premises at casinos/gaming facilities.
  • Notes: SEC betting and football wagering is huge in Mississippi. There was some effort in 2019 to legalize sports wagering throughout the state, but it failed. Betting handle has stagnated and won’t increase much as online (off premises) remains unavailable. The physical casinos are concentrated in two areas of the state — on the Gulf Coast in Biloxi and in Tunica in the northwestern part of the state near Arkansas and Tennessee.

New Jersey

  • Market launch date: August 2018
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: 11
  • Online: Permitted statewide; remote registration allowed.
  • Brands: There are 14 unique NJ online sportsbook currently available, including:
  • Notes: Online sports betting handle has represented up to 83% of the total wagers placed in recent months. Overall handle reached $318.9 mm in bets in May 2019, outstripping Nevada’s handle at $317.4 handle in the same month, the first time NJ eclipsed Nevada, although there’s an asterisk.

New Mexico

  • Market launch date: October 2018
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Three (3) at present (and soon to be four), near Sante Fe and Albuquerque.
  • Online: Not yet, but there are recent legislative rumblings about online gambling and perhaps sports wagering, too.
  • Notes: Sportsbook operator US Bookmaking was the first in state at the Santa Ana Star Casino & Hotel. William Hill recently entered the market through a partnership with the Inn of the Mountain Gods Casino. The tribal-state compacts, revenue sharing arrangements and exclusivity over gaming, as in many other states, may stifle the launch of the online market.

Nevada

  • Market launch date: Circa 1949.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Many!
  • Online: Yes, however in-person registration is still required.
  • Brands: Numerous.
  • Notes: Nevada has been the Mecca of sports betting for decades and it’s the epicenter of industry talent, some of which is leaving the state for other opportunities. The market is obviously very mature, however some new bookmakers and sportsbooks such as Derek Stevens and Circa are looking to make a splash in the desert. The total Nevada betting handle has exceeded $5 billion annually in recent years and over $550 million in peak months.

New York

  • Market launch date: July 2019.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Three (3) and growing, located at both commercial casinos and tribal gaming properties.
  • Online: No — not yet. It’s a point of great contention and debate. Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s office has taken the position that mobile sports wagering requires a constitutional amendment, a process that takes a minimum of three years. A constitutional amendment first needs to be passed by two consecutive sessions of the state legislature before appearing on a ballot referendum the following year. However, some lawmakers disagree, and a bill to permit mobile sports wagering statewide passed by an overwhelming margin, but effectively died when the Assembly failed to hold a vote on similar legislation before the end of the 2019 session.
  • Brands: FanDuel Sportsbook (Tioga Downs), The Lounge at Caesars (Turning Stone Casino Resort), DraftKings Sportsbook (del Lago Resort & Casino), Bet Rivers (Rivers Casino & Resort), among others.
  • Notes: A 2013 law dubbed the Upstate New York Gaming Economic Development Act Upstate Act authorized four new commercial casinos, including sports wagering at those facilities (and tribal properties) in the event that federal law changed to permit legal sports betting. Obviously, that happened when the Supreme Court struck PASPA. But the 2013 law did not permit mobile sports wagering statewide, which leaves New York in its position now where there are retail sportsbooks at great distances from the major population centers, at a time when 83% of bets are made on mobile/online in New Jersey.

Pennsylvania

  • Market launch date: November 2018.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Six (6) and counting.
  • Online: Yes, and remote registration is permitted.
  • Brands: FanDuel Sportsbook, William Hill, SugarHouse, BetRivers, Caesars (coming), FOX Bet, Parx.
  • Notes: Online sports betting was slow to roll out as the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board was busy (and sluggish) developing regulations for both online casinos gambling and sports wagering at the same time. But finally online sports betting arrived in May 2019 (SugarHouse) and more recently the formidable FanDuel Sportsbook made its full-fledged entrance. Pennsylvania’s marketplace came courtesy of a 2017 law that, like Mississippi’s, preemptively legalized sports wagering in the event of a change in federal law.

Rhode Island

  • Market launch date: November 2018.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Two (2) at Twin Rivers Casino Hotel and Tiverton Casino Hotel.
  • Online: Yes, legalized in March 2019. The state is aiming for a Nov. 2019 launch and has plans to begin testing systems in August 2019. Per the law, patrons will have to register in person at one of the two casinos in order to access the mobile app.
  • Brands: Both retail sportsbooks are operated by William Hill in conjunction with the Rhode Island Lottery. It’s unclear to date how the online/mobile apps will be branded or appear.
  • Notes: Rhode Island’s legislature passed its law legalizing sports wagering in June 2018. The sportsbooks took a serious $2.4 million beating from Super Bowl LIII and a $900K loss in Feb. 2019 thanks to the regional favorite New England Patriots suffocating the Los Angeles Rams. (Perhaps also due to some poor risk-management.) In a unique revenue-sharing arrangement, the state lottery takes 51% of total sports wagering receipts, more than any state in the country, as supplier IGT keeps 32% and the Twin Rivers (casinos) 17%.

West Virginia

  • Market launch date: August 2018.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Three (3) at present.
  • Online: Yes, but kind it’s been a real cluster to date. In March, the Delaware North properties (Wheeling Island Hotel Casino Racetrack and Mardi Gras Casino & Resort) shut down their BetLucky online sports betting app because of its digital supplier Miomni Gaming’s contractual dispute with third-party technology supplier Entergaming.
  • Brands: They include FanDuel Sportsbook (The Greenbrier), William Hill (Hollywood Casino and Mountaineer Casino). Operations both retail and online are suspended at Wheeling Island and Mardi Gras.
  • Notes: Following the BetLucky’s shuttering, no sportsbooks have yet come online nor has any property gotten approved to go online or had its systems tested yet. In June 2019, Lottery Director John Myers said there was no recent movement. Previously, the Lottery, which regulates/oversees WV sports betting, has indicated that some concerns over litigation involving state lotteries, online gaming and the US Department of Justice’s re-interpretation of the Wire Act was cause for some trepidation about moving forward. “The launch of the DraftKings sports wagering app has been delayed to ensure compliance with the Federal Wire Act according to West Virginia Lottery Director John Myers,” the Lottery said in a June 5, 2019 statement.

Legal but yet to launch (as of August 2019)

Illinois

  • Market launch date:  Expected to see first retail sportsbooks operational in late 2019 or early 2020.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Fourteen (14) or more — one at each of the state’s existing casinos (10), racetracks (3), a to-be constructed casino in the Chicago area plus Illinois professional stadiums such as Wrigley Field (believe it or not).
  • Online: Yes, but in-person registration for accounts required until 2021.
  • Brands (expected): For the first 18 months, likely Caesars, SugarHouse, William Hill, PointsBet, and others.
  • Path to legalization: The state legalized sports wagering via a massive capital bill in June 2019, SB 690, that included the framework for legal sports betting.
  • Notes: Some lobbying from the casino powers were able to secure a “head start” over online-only operators, such as FanDuel and DraftKings, which have dominated the New Jersey market. For the first 18 months after the brick and mortar sportsbooks launch, online-only operators will be prohibited; after, three “master online licenses” will be awarded, at a cost of $20 million each, to stand-alone mobile and online sportsbooks. Licensed operators will be required to use “official league data” for in-play sports wagering.

Indiana:

  • Market launch date: September 2019 is the approximate target for first launches.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Fourteen (14) existing casinos and racetracks across the state are permitted to offer retail sportsbooks.
  • Online: Yes, and remote registration is permitted.
  • Brands: Licensed casinos will be allowed to contract with up to three brands for mobile/online sports wagering. You are certain to see FanDuel Sportsbook, DraftKings Sportsbook, William Hill, Caesars, BetMGM and most of the same apps/platforms in New Jersey become available in Indiana.
  • Notes: Indiana’s market is shaped to closely resemble New Jersey’s, especially in that each of the license-holders are allowed to offer up to three “skins” or online brands. In July 2019, the state gaming commission released a list of sports that operators can offering wagering upon.
  • Path to legalization: There were big proponents but big doubts legalization would come together in ‘19, but the state legislature delivered legal sports betting through a gambling expansion bill HB 1015, passed at the 11th hour in May 2019. Initially mobile sports betting was stripped from the bill but was added back in late.

Iowa:

  • Market launch date: September 2019 is the approximate target for first launches.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Nineteen (19) state-licensed commercial casinos and three (3) tribal casinos will be eligible to offer legal sports betting at retail sportsbooks.
  • Online: Yes — each property will be allowed to use have two or more sportsbooks or “skins” (brands) active. However, patrons will not be allowed to register remotely for these sportsbooks until Jan. 1, 2021. Meaning they will have to go in person to a casino in order to begin accessing the sportsbooks that those casinos offer online.
  • Path to legalization: Iowa’s legislature began discussing legalization prior to PASPA’s fall in May 2018.  Things moved along in 2019 with SF 617, which Governor Kim Reynolds signed on May 13, a day before the anniversary of PASPA’s death.
  • Notes: One peculiarity in Iowa is that sportsbooks are prohibited from offering in-game prop bets on games involving in-state collegiate teams (such as Iowa State).

Montana:

  • Market launch date: Fall 2019.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: None, however taverns and other approved locations will have sports betting kiosks on premises where patrons can make legal sports bets.
  • Online: No.
  • Brands: The Montana State Lottery will be in charge of regulation and oversight. The state lottery is planning to use its existing vendor, Intralot, to also run its sports betting operations/kiosks the state.
  • Path to legalization: There isn’t much legal gambling in Montana. The “lottery bill” that Governor Steve Bullock signed was backed by the powerful Montana Tavern Association, with the idea that kiosks could be placed in its members establishments, thereby driving business in the door. But the state legislature actually passed two sports betting bills, the other being SB 330, which would have also allowed commercial operators to enter the marketplace. However, Bullock vetoed and the legislature failed to override. “For the market to succeed, Montana needs to enter the sports wagering market conservatively — adopting only one of the two models now,” he said in a May 2019 statement.
  • Notes: Continuing with Bullock, a look at the future: “If, in two years, the market can tolerate more entrants, then I fully expect the legislature will revisit whether a second model is prudent for our state.” Montana was among the four states that had some form for sports betting grandfathered under PASPA, however new legislation was deemed necessary for this new era.

New Hampshire

  • Market launch date: Late 2019 or early 2020.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks:  Up to 10 licenses will be available for legal operations at physical locations or “sports lounges”  throughout the state.
  • Online:  Yes — 5 licenses will be available through the New Hampshire Lottery Commission to offer mobile/online sports wagering. These stand-alone online sportsbooks will not be tethered to an existing sportsbook.
  • Brands: To be determined but with a cap of five and no mandatory “tethering”  to a brick and mortar (and associated costs or revenue sharing), there will probably be a pretty competitive bidding process for access.
  • Path to legalization: The state legislature took up sports betting in the spring of 2019 with strong support from Governor Chris Sununu.
  • Notes: The New Hampshire Lottery will regulate sports betting, and the law allows for the lottery to have some of its own sports betting games. New Hampshire does not have any casinos, but sports “lounges” will be legal within the state and can placed within existing businesses, including bars or resort hotels, and gives individual municipalities the right to approve — or not — having a sports lounge within its borders.

Oregon 

  • Market launch date: September 2019 target
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Undetermined; the Oregon Lottery, which will manage regulation and oversight, is planning full-fledged wagering via a mobile app and at physical locations — limited to retailers and on kiosks.
  • Online:  Yes.
  • Brands: Oregon Lottery with SB Tech as its sports betting technology supplier.
  • Path to legalization: Oregon was among the four states with some sports gambling grandfathered under PASPA and as such, officials do not believe new legislation is necessary to proceed with expanded sports wagering offerings.
  • Notes: As the Oregon Lottery moves forward with sports betting, tribal gaming interests in the state don’t appear to have made any moves toward offering sports betting. Oregon has nine tribal casinos, including four along the coast.

Tennessee

  • Market launch date: Fall or winter 2019.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: None. Tennessee does not have any existing casinos/gaming entities. Sports betting will occur online only.
  • Online: Yes. Remote registration permitted.
  • Brands: To be determined; almost certain to include major, well-financed national operators such as FanDuel and MGM.
  • Path to legalization: A surprise state to legalize as the governor opposes any gaming expansion. Nevertheless, the Volunteer State legalized online/ mobile-only sports betting in April 2019 with HB 1 (a substitute for SB 16). The law became effective on July 1, 2019. Regulation responsibility belongs to the Tennessee Lottery Corporation.
  • Notes: Licensed operators will be required to use “official league data” for in-play sports wagering.

Washington, D.C. 

  • Market launch date: Target fall or winter 2019.
  • Number of land-based sportsbooks: Five (5) at max, located at the professional sport stadiums including Capital One Arena, home to the NBA’s Wizards and NHL’s Capitals. Also, the bill allows for “Class B” licenses, meaning bars, restaurants and some other establishments may apply for a sports betting certificate and offer an app or perhaps kiosks available on premises,  as long as they’re located outside a two-block radius from the arenas, so-called “exclusivity zones.”
  • Online: Yes, however:
  • Brands: Only the app supplied by the D.C. Lottery’s vendor Intralot will be available citywide.
  • Path to legalization: Windy and peppered with corruption. The Washington Post has closely tracked the D.C. Council’s controversial awarding of the sports betting contract to Intralot — with benefits flowing to persons and groups connected to the D.C. Council. The Council allowed a bypassing of the traditional Request for Proposal process and made Intralot its sports betting vendor without considering other proposals.
  • Notes: The bypassing of the RFP process and allowing the sole-sourcing deal to Intralot was based in large part on a dubious “study” by Spectrum Gaming Group in which the consultant suggested that the city’s platform should target a 20% or higher hold percentage in a business where 5 to 7 percent is more standard. In other words, this app may have a very high vig/overround, or a terrible product that keeps many people betting offshore.

Sports betting stakeholders: Impact on market, consumers

The present and future of U.S. sports betting will be shaped by the consumers — the American people — but also in large part by the various players who make the gears of sports and sports betting turn. Namely, sportsbook operators, sports leagues, casinos and gaming facilities, including commercial casinos and Native American entities; also state and federal lawmakers and state lotteries.

In this section we discuss the general positions of the various stakeholders, their impacts and goals.

Sports leagues

The case that mercifully opened the door to legal sports betting across the U.S. was Murphy v NCAA. Indeed, the NCAA as well as the four major pro sports leagues (NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL) were instrumental in getting PASPA through Congress in 1992 and in enforcing it by repeatedly blocking several state-level attempts to legalize sports wagering.

But in 2014, the brand new NBA commissioner at the time, Adam Silver, taking over from longtime commish David Stern, signaled a recognition of the future and reality: legal sports betting is safe, better for (almost) everyone than rampant sports gambling in unmonitored, illegal markets, and it’s pretty darn good for the business of sports leagues. He generally penned this view in a New York Times op-ed, “Legalize And Regulate Sports Betting.” Still, the federal ban was enforced, and it took four more years for PASPA’s fatal blow.

Even before the high court ruled, the NBA and MLB (with the PGA Tour alongside) began lobbying state legislatures for the implementation of its preferred framework for legal sports betting, its “Model Legislation,” fleshed out and first presented in January 2018.

Among other things, the NBA and MLB were seeking:

  1. An “integrity fee”: Now called a “royalty” — they began asking for a 1 percent off-the-top cut of all wagers to pay for league “integrity monitoring” services. Both leagues have generally conceded these sums would be “compensation,” not for integrity purposes. Read all about it here. The NBA, MLB and PGA Tour have lowered their “Request” to 0.25 percent off the top. The NFL and NHL have deemed such a thing unnecessary and have not publicly pursued it. More recently, in May 2019, Sports Handle uncovered that the NBA and MLB had advised various Nevada sportsbook operators that they were requiring a direct agreement with the league in order to access “official data” through third parties, even where sportsbooks had pre-existing agreements for data supply. And further, the agreements those leagues are seeking would pay the leagues the very same off-the-top cut that the leagues are attempting to have implemented by state governments, even in states that declined to require such. To be continued.
  2. Mandated usage of “official league data”: What is sports betting data and “official” versus “unofficial” league data? Read about it here. Sports Handle has written and reported about the subject extensively. The gist of the “war” over data involving the NBA and MLB boils down to this: Sports leagues want legal sportsbooks across the country to pay for information about the games. They claim (dishonestly) that it’s necessary to preserve integrity. It’s about monetization. So far, only Illinois and Tennessee have passed laws mandating that its sportsbooks use/purchase “official league data” The NFL and NHL have taken a softer approach — suggesting its usage, but without aggressive campaigning for it. The main objection is that commercial relationships regarding sports betting risk-management and information suppliers should be left to private negotiation — not by government mandate.
  3. Control through other means: The leagues have also sought the right to request that state regulators prohibit certain kinds of wagers that the leagues deem unsafe. They have also requested access to anonymized betting data at state-licensed sportsbooks. States have generally shown reluctance to accommodate these requests.

All in all, sports betting increases viewership, engagement and the value of advertising on television and digital streaming. Leagues have struck various partnerships with gaming entities and sportsbooks directly (such as MGM becoming the NBA’s first official gaming partner), NHL with FanDuel, and numerous individual teams with sportsbooks, such as William Hill and the Vegas Golden Knights). In other words, brand new revenue streams have opened and existing ones will get buttressed.

Each of the sports leagues — major or a tier or two below, such as NASCAR with its own  “data deal” with Betgenius, are seeking and cutting deals related to sports betting.

Another frontier: New statistics and new markets for legal wagering. MLB and MGM are in the process of exploring betting on baseball’s “Statcast” data, which offers advanced stats shown on broadcasts (or available online) such as home run distance. No state has yet approved Statcast wagering. Likewise, the NHL is exploring the use of advanced stats, for licensure and betting. And consider that MGM acquired some ashes from the remains of the Alliance of American Football (AAF), it’s gambling app, for $125,000.

National operators

Large gaming entities for which sports betting is a very small fraction of overall revenue, such as MGM Resorts International, as well as online-only, DFS-turned-sportsbook operators like DraftKings, are racing for market share. The overall gaming market has seen some consolidation — namely Eldorado Resorts’ acquisition of Caesars Entertainment — and access deals such as the Boyd Gaming deal with FanDuel Sportsbook, putting the latter brand into various states in online and retail form.

A couple articles discussing the various companies involved:

As more and more states flip the switch for legal sports betting, we will see healthy competition and turf wars, which ultimately is good for the consumer. Well, except where states are putting clamps down and implementing market conditions that stifle competition, such as in Washington, D.C. Speaking of…

State lotteries

What role do state lotteries have in sports betting? In some jurisdictions, such as Delaware, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee and D.C., the lottery commission (or similarly termed body) will either have regulatory and/or oversight authority over sports betting.

Each state has to decide which body is best equipped to implement and manage the jurisdiction’s sports betting market. Does the lottery commission have the requisite experience to do it well and maximize revenue for state coffers? Should commercial operators be allowed to enter? Should the state’s casinos be able to obtain the licenses? What about a model where commercial casinos can operate online and in retail, but the lottery also gets to offer sports betting products of some kind? In almost every state where the lottery exists (which is most), the lottery wants to be involved in some capacity or have a cut.

Native American, tribal gaming entities

Tribal gaming exists all across the U.S. in accordance with federal law (IGRA) and tribal-state compacts, which govern the terms and conditions of gaming in the state, from which games are allowed in casinos, and which mandates revenue sharing between the state and the recognized tribe.

Tribes have exclusivity or the exclusive right to offer certain types of gaming in some states, or some limited exclusivity in others. States with only tribal gaming and no commercial casinos at present, such as Minnesota and North Carolina, have a lot of sway over the state government. In states such as Connecticut and Oklahoma, where the tribes generate over $100 million annually for the state through revenue sharing agreements, they have a lot of sway. There’s a combination of politics, economics and interpretation at play in every state, trying to balance the various interests.

Overall, while some tribes are progressive and have already embraced and benefited from the sports betting opportunity, many tribes have approached it with skepticism. Sports betting, unlike slot machines, can be pretty volatile and is much lower margin. It takes experience. Sportsbooks take up space; is it worth it to create or re-appropriate room for a sportsbook? Will it be akin to another amenity like a spa and bring in a new kind of patron? These are among the questions that tribes are exploring nationally. Often change takes time.

A trio of articles for further reading:

State and federal government

Put simply, states are most interested, in general, in maximizing taxable revenue for the state, and shaping the market as such.  It should be obvious the primary concern for all stakeholders is indeed preserving the integrity of games — both through betting integrity and sporting integrity. But after that, decisions boil down to money, which lead to decisions about the appropriate tax rate, and which regulatory body (perhaps a brand new one) ought to and is equipped to oversee legal sports betting.

The 1992 federal foray into sports betting — PASPA — proved unconstitutional. When might it take another stab? Former Utah senator Orrin Hatch and New York senator Chuck Schumer took a stab with the introduction of the Sports Wagering Market Integrity Act of 2018 during Congress’ lame duck season. But the bill — which would have basically created a clearinghouse and some federal standards for state sports betting markets — didn’t have any legs. It was mostly for symbolic and conversation’s sake.

Earlier, in September 2018, A House Judiciary subcommittee held a hearing titled “Post-PASPA: An Examination of Sports Betting in America.” It was pretty silly and overall inconsequential.

Sports betting education, materials

Come for some practical or actionable sports betting guidance/advice? We’ve got you with a variety of articles and explanations.

Regulated vs. offshore and illegal bookie sports betting

As a result of PASPA, state-authorized legal sports betting in the U.S. was frozen in time, leaving Nevada as the only state with full-fledged legal sports betting, drawing an annual betting handle of about $5 billion. Now compare that with the estimated annual betting handle in 2017 of about $150 billion with illegal books and offshore sportsbooks operating illegally. Both of them filled the void created by the now-defunct federal law.

Regulated markets are not homogeneous across the U.S. and regulated sports betting in general is by no means perfect. Illegal operators have some advantages and will retain some or many customers in the era of legalization, however legal sports betting through state-licensed operators has loads of upside, is generally safe, and is only getting better thanks in part to technological advancements and fierce competition for market share.

Now some pros and cons of regulated sports betting:

[Also see:  Q&A: Here’s How a Local Bookie Really Operates: Myths and Reality]

Pros:

  • Safety of identity: This primarily applies to online sportsbooks, where players on legal books will have to complete an exhaustive registration process in order to be approved for real-money wagering. While this could initially be perceived as a con, it’s designed to protect patrons from identity theft and other scams. In addition, bettors on legal books will have the state’s regulatory committee on their side. Should they feel slighted by a book, they will have an outlet to voice, and likely resolve, their complaint.
  • Safety of funds: Regulated books have to answer to their respective license-issuing regulatory bodies. Consumer protection standards are much higher. You may find yourself in a dispute, but by and large you can rest assured that your funds are safe and the sportsbook won’t go belly up or offline at random and leave you empty handed.
  • Ease of deposits and withdrawals: As many users of offshore sportsbooks know, due in large part to the federal law UIGEA, it can be quite difficult (and nerve-wracking) to deposit funds and collect winnings/withdrawals. It’s the opposite in regulated markets where you can deposit through ACH, bank transfers, PayPal and possibly even credit cards.

Cons:

  1. Impact of taxes and fees: There is debate about the impact of high tax rates on gross revenue. The bottom line is, higher taxes impacts the bottom line, and something has to give. This may result in inferior pricing as competitors in illegal markets have the advantage of lower overhead.
  2. No credit lines: This is the biggie. Many local bookies extend credit to customers, so they don’t have to deposit in the first place. You lose, pay up. You win, collect. Most states haven’t and likely won’t allow credit for sports gambling. Same way you can’t use credit cards to purchase lottery tickets.
  3. More restrictive offerings for props or novelty wagering: Regulators must approve that types of sports betting markets that licensees can offer. In the offshore world, anything can go. In most states, so far, you won’t find Oscars or political betting markets, some of the wackier Super Bowl props (such as Gatorade color).

Online sports betting FAQ

In-person versus remote registration: What’s the difference?

Some states including Nevada and Rhode Island allow online/mobile sports betting, however they require patrons to appear in person with an ID in order to establish the account. In other states, including New Jersey and Pennsylvania, it’s much easier. You can use your ID and other verification measures online to establish an account at any state-licensed sportsbook. This saves a trip, gas money, and allows people to easily establish several accounts for the sake of line or price shopping.

How do I deposit at a legal online sportsbook?

It varies from state to state and sportsbook to sportsbook, but with most, you can use ACH (eCheck), an online bank transfer, a debit card or a prepaid card at some kind; in a growing number of states you can use PayPal or deposit funds with cash at the sportsbook’s partner casino. In some states you can fund an account with a credit card or “Pay With Cash” location, or also use Neteller.

How do I withdraw money from a legal online sportsbook?

In most but not all cases, you can withdraw through the same source/means that you used for a deposit.

Do online books offer more bets than retail books?

It depends what book you’re using. But the general answer is probably yes, because it’s much easier to make in-game or live bets using digital technology, as opposed to having to wait on line and see a teller to get down a bet.

Can online sports bets be placed from anywhere?

It depends on the state. In many states, regardless of whether you’ve registered in person or remotely, mobile sports bets can be placed from anywhere: Your living room, at Buffalo Wild Wings, the bathroom, etc.

Some states however only allow mobile sports bets to be placed on casino premises (or another licensed gaming facility like a tavern). The state is able to enforce this policy through geofencing technology. Basically, the location function on your phone has to be turned on to place a wager, and the app detects where you are located. You must also be located in the state where you are placing the bet. In other words, you can’t book a bet at an NJ online sportsbook if you’re hanging out in New York.

What markets/bet formats are available?

While it varies from sportsbook to sportsbook (and some like PointsBet offer a unique type of “action points” betting), you can make these wagers at nearly every sportsbook across the U.S.:

  • Spread bets
  • Moneyline wagers
  • Totals (team, quarters, halves, etc.)
  • Props (player, team and scoring props)
  • Futures (such as who will win the Super Bowl or NBA championship for example)
  • At many sportsbooks you will now find live, in-game wagering options/platforms

How are the odds/prices online?

Your mileage may vary from one shop to another, but by and large they’re either competitive with or either slightly to moderately worse than offerings by unregulated, offshore and illegal markets that are free from regulatory responsibilities. For example, spread bets at most legal books are -110 on both sides for an NFL game.

It’s more than plausible that the gap in pricing to tighten even further as the industry matures.

What are sports betting kiosks?

They’re self-service stations like grocery store self-checkouts or ATM machines. Look through a menu, pick your wager(s), print the ticket and watch the game. Where kiosks are offered you can redeem your winnings at the machine or at the sportsbook ticket

window. Read more about kiosks here.

The history behind U.S. sports betting

Everyone who enjoys legal sports betting owes thanks to the state of New Jersey. For roughly a decade leading up to the “Supreme Court sports betting case,” or Murphy v. NCAA, New Jersey found creative ways to challenge the federal law banning full-fledged sports betting outside Nevada, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA, 28 U.S. Code Chapter 178). United States Congress passed the law in 1992 with backing from the major professional U.S. sports leagues.

The law, which the high court ruled unconstitutional in May 2018, basically said that it was unlawful for a state (its state legislature), Nevada excluded, to authorize or license sportsbooks. (Three other states — Delaware, Montana and Oregon — had some limited forms of sports gambling “grandfathered” under PASPA, allowing them to continue.)

A combination of New Jersey lawmakers led by Ray Lesniak, officials from Monmouth Park Racetrack,  and former Governor Chris Christie, wouldn’t stand for it. Among other actions, the New Jersey legislature in 2011 put a public question that appeared on New Jersey’s November general-election ballot, asking if the state constitution should be amended to authorize wagering on professional and amateur sports at casinos and racetracks. The referendum passed by a wide 64-36 margin.

Ultimately the battle ended up in the Supreme Court, where top lawyers Ted Olson (for New Jersey) and Paul Clement (for the leagues), both who served at one time as the U.S. Solicitor General, argued about the law’s constitutionality. The main sticking point was the way the law worked — what it did and didn’t do. And because, the court found, the law “commandeered” the states, or directed and controlled state legislatures, as opposed to directly regulating or prohibiting sports betting, the Supreme Court found that it violated states rights’ or Tenth Amendment Principles.

Writing the majority opinion in a 6-3 decision (with some agreement by Justice Breyer but some disagreement in part) released on May 14, 2018,, Justice Samuel Alito stated:

The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make.

Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each State is free to act on its own. Our job is to interpret the law Congress has enacted and decide whether it is consistent with the Constitution. PASPA is not. PASPA ‘regulate[s] state governments’ regulation’ of their citizens, New York, 505 U. S., at 166. The Constitution gives Congress no such power. The judgment of the Third Circuit is reversed.”

Delaware and New Jersey off, running and booking wagers

Because Delaware already had some sports betting systems in place for its NFL parlay betting — which was “grandfathered,” or allowed to continue, under PASPA) — it didn’t waste any time racing to become the first post-PASPA state to allow full-fledged legal sports betting. State lottery director Vernon Kirk said the state didn’t need new regulations, rather it just needed to dust off existing technology and re-train employees for a full menu of sports betting offered in partnership with Scientific Games and William Hill.

Delaware Governor John Carney placed the first bet at Dover Downs Hotel & Casino on June 5, 2018 — a winner.

Though a bit disappointed that Delaware beat them to the punch, New Jersey still needed to pass its actual legal sports betting law before sports wagering could begin at state-licensed operators.

The New Jersey legislature got it done in early June 2018 with Assembly Bill 4111. Then on June 14, 2018, two sportsbooks opened for business in New Jersey — at Monmouth Park Racetrack in Oceanport, N.J. and at the MGM-operated Borgata Race & Sports Book in Atlantic City, N.J.

Governor Phil Murphy placed the first bet that morning around 10:00 a.m., exactly one month after the Supreme Court struck the ban.

“New Jersey’s spirit and determination prevailed,” Murphy said, prior to stepping to the ticket window to make the first two wagers. “I’ll be betting $20 on Germany to win the World Cup and $20 on the Devils to win the next Stanley Cup.”

Of course France won the World Cup in 2018 and the St. Louis Blues won the next Stanley Cup, but never mind that. On the same day,  NBA legend “Dr. J” Julius Erving placed the first wager at the Borgata half an hour after Murphy’s bet. Dr. J. bet $5 on the Philadelphia Eagles at 8-1 to repeat as Super Bowl Champions in Feb. 2019 (another Patriots title).

From this point, more retail or brick-and-mortar sportsbooks opened across New Jersey, including the FanDuel Sportsbook at the Meadowlands, which has proven the most popular spot to bet both in person and online — certainly helped by its proximity to New York State and New York City.

DraftKings Sportsbook did come online first — officially on August 6, 2018, with a platform powered by Kambi.  And it proved quite popular, thanks to a large existing database of users through its daily fantasy sports.

Other states get in the game

New Jersey and Delaware were quick out of the gate and so was West Virginia (mobile sports betting came later … sort of) which had preemptively passed its sports betting law in March 2018. Also Mississippi (mobile sports betting allowed on-premises only) in 2017 passed a law that included language allowing legal sports wagering.

Other states that passed launched legal sports operations in 2018 include Pennsylvania (November 2018, mobile sports betting came later) and Rhode Island (November 2018, mobile sports betting came later).

Out West in New Mexico where tribal casinos are numerous, The Santa Ana Star Casino & Hotel, a tribal gaming operation near Albuquerque, New Mexico, opened a sportsbook in October 2018. Although New Mexico did not pass a law explicitly allowing sports wagering, the state’s attorney general determined that casinos could offer it under the existing tribal-state compact. In addition, in November 2018 voters in Arkansas approved a measure to allow casinos as well as legal sports betting at those properties.

That was a lot of action for one year and 2019 became poised to be even busier on the legislative front across the country, and indeed it was. Bills of all different kinds were introduced, discussed and passed in multiple jurisdictions. Some that would create a market more like New Jersey’s, some more like Mississippi’s, with all different tax rates and models for the number of sportsbooks allowed in person and online.

Get Email Updates