• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

A Bet By Any Other Name Would Still Smell Like Gambling

Is a lot of stock trading pure gambling? Two research papers think so

Jeff Edelstein by Jeff Edelstein
March 1, 2021
in Opinion
bull vs. bear
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In recent months, Wall Street mania has overtaken the sports betting and daily fantasy world (so has NBA Top Shots, but I can only handle one thing I barely understand at a time, thank you very much). But yes: Many of the Twitter accounts of my favorite sports gambling and DFS players have been littered with stock talk, especially since the GameStop saga.Β 

And sure, I get it: The center of the Venn diagram between sports gamblers and stock market investors is probably pretty damn robust. When there’s money to be made out of thin air, people who try to make money out of the thin air over here are likely to head over there to try and do the same.

Of course, we’re talking about two different things, namely gambling and investing. But more and more — and again, especially in the market’s current climate, where Reddit boards are shaking the industry and penny stocks rise and fall in head-spinning percentage moves — the line between β€œgambling” and β€œinvesting” is thin, very thin.

But don’t trust me: Trust Alok Kumar of the University of Miami, Thanh Huong Nguyen of The University of Danang in Vietnam, and Tālis J. PutniΕ†Ε‘ of the University of Technology Sydney as well as the Stockholm School of Economics. They are the authors of a recent paper that posits that almost 15% of all stock-market trading in developed countries — and a full third in emerging markets — is full-on, no questions asked, pure gambling.

The trio concentrated their study on so-called β€œlottery” vs. β€œnon-lottery” stocks. You know. Penny stocks that trade over the counter or on the β€œpink sheets” (watch The Wolf of Wall Street for a more detailed breakdown). And what they found — among other, financial-y type things — is that people like investing in these high-risk, purely speculative stocks. A lot. Like, a whole lot.Β 

So much so that they estimate 3.5 times more gambling takes place within the confines of (cough-cough) β€œinvesting” than takes place in all the casinos, racetracks, and sportsbooks of the world.

Bet, invest, CEO stuff, rinse, repeat

β€œI don’t know how many zeros were behind the decimal point. All I know is I spent $1,400 on a million shares, and it went to .005 or something, and I tripled my money. I couldn’t even tell you one thing about the company, but I saw in on some message board and bought it. To me, this is pure gambling.”

The above anecdote comes from a CEO of a company in the Northeast that does nearly $50 million in business each year. This CEO — who I personally know, and who would prefer to not be named — is also an avid sports gambler and stock-market investor. He has his long-term investments, his blue chips, his retirement funds.

He also has roughly $50,000 floating around at any one time in stocks with a lot of zeros behind those decimal points.

β€œIt’s expectations. When I bet on a game or bet on a horse, there’s a predicted outcome, there’s only two things that can happen. The over hits, or it doesn’t. The horse wins, or he doesn’t,” he said. β€œWith the stock market, there’s a tremendous amount of variables. I was in a stock recently at nine cents. When do you get out? At 90 cents? All right, you get out at 90 cents, and it goes down to 40 cents, you played it perfectly. But it never ends.Β 

β€œThe biggest thing as a gambler is that not making money is worse than losing money,” he continued. β€œI bet the Patriots and they lose, so be it. I buy whatever penny stock at one cent and it goes to zero, so be it. It goes to a nickel and I sell and 5X my money? I’m happy. But if it then goes to $5? I’m miserable. I’d rather it have gone to zero.”

Yep. I think this CEO might be Patient Zero in the Kumar // Nguyen // Putniņő study.

β€œI’m investing in these stocks purely to get rich,” he said. β€œIf one of these things goes to $10, that’s life-changing money. I’m not making life-changing money at the track.”

Sunday losses, Monday comebacks

β€œWe found that the break-even hypothesis was supported following negative sentiment and losses from football gambling,” said Justin Cox, an assistant professor of finance at Appalachian State University. β€œInvestors apparently used the stock market to offset losses or break even. Particularly, these lottery-like stocks that have a low share price, high volatility, and returns that are highly skewed. Basically, they are using penny stocks with huge potential payoffs to try to recoup their losses.”

Cox, along with Adam Schwartz of Bucknell University and Robert Van Ness of the University of Mississippi, are the authors of a study published last August titled β€œDoes what happens in Vegas stay in Vegas? Football gambling and stock market activity.” The question they asked was relatively straightforward: What happens on Mondays in the stock market following a college and professional football weekend?

Crunching over a decade’s worth of Vegas sportsbook data and the same amount of Wall Street data from various sources, what they found isn’t terribly surprising: Bettors who took a bath on the weekend jumped into the market on Monday — specifically in penny stocks — in an effort to get square. The opposite didn’t hold true, as winning bettors over the weekend did not try to double up in the market come Monday. And furthermore, how someone did in the market did not impact their football betting.

So whaddya say, doc? Sports bettors and penny stock investors part of the same breed?

β€œI would say so,” Cox said. β€œThat’s at least my inference from the paper that we wrote. I do think there is some type of aspect in which the clientele in sports betting is very similar to what you’re seeing in the market, specifically in these speculative, lottery-like stocks. That’s my inference.”

One notion for a future study, here: As sports betting becomes more and more accessible and acceptable, will that have a spillover into the speculative portions of the stock market? Is that perhaps even happening as we speak?Β 

In the end, as with most everything, there’s no easy answer. Frankly, I’m not even sure what the question is. But as time ticks by, it is becoming increasingly clear that the term β€œgambling” is in need of a much bigger umbrella.

ShareTweetShare
Jeff Edelstein

Jeff Edelstein

Jeff is a veteran journalist, working as a columnist for The Trentonian newspaper in Trenton, NJ for a number of years. He's also an avid sports bettor and DFS player. He can be reached at [email protected]

Related Posts

Promotions

PointsBet Pre-Registration Welcome Offer for Maryland Launch: $200 in Free Bets

November 21, 2022
Bet on NHL hockey with BetMGM
Promotions

BetMGM Bonus Code HANDLETOP for Early Season NHL

October 12, 2022
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...