• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Leagues’ Response Brief in Supreme Court Betting Case: Federal Ban Requires ‘Nothing’ of States

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
October 17, 2017
in Regulation
The Lawmaker Fighting New Jersey’s Fight Since the Beginning of the Case, Ray Lesniak, Reflects on the State of the Supreme Court Betting Case, the Arguments and How New Jersey Stands to Benefit

Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

On Monday before the deadline, attorneys for Respondents led by Paul D. Clement filed their brief on the merits in the matter of Christie vs. NCAA, better known as New Jersey’s sports betting against the leagues in the Supreme Court of the United States. The NCAA along with the NFL, NHL, NBA and MLB (the “Leagues”) filed the 71-page brief arguing that the 1992 federal law effectively banning sports betting outside Nevada is permitted because it’s the federal law of the land, regardless of whether states wish to have sports betting in their borders.

The Leagues argue that the that specific law at issue, the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act (PASPA), represents an “ordinary and appropriate operation of the Supremacy Clause” and does not impose any affirmative or coercive action on New Jersey (or other states) that would qualify as “commandeering,” as New Jersey argues in its opening brief.

The Leagues Stick to the Script, Arguing That PASPA Is a Routine Application of the Supremacy Clause That Requires New Jersey to ‘Do Nothing’

The Leagues Stick to the Script, Arguing That PASPA Is a Routine Application of the Supremacy Clause That Requires New Jersey to ‘Do Nothing’
Paul D. Clement

All along through this legal saga and in the most recent chapter beginning in 2012, the Leagues have argued that there is nothing unusual about PASPA — although interpretations of PASPA in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals have evolved somewhat.

Disputing New Jersey and the New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association (collectively Petitioners) arguments that PASPA violates the “anti-commandeering” doctrine by forcing it to upkeep and enforce anti-gambling prohibitions, the Leagues spend a lot of space discussing the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2 of the Constitution) and federal preemption of state laws and state courts. They write:

 

 

“While PASPA requires states to refrain from engaging in certain conduct and from embracing certain policies, it does not force them to adopt federally-prescribed policies or to enforce federal law. Put differently, PASPA preempts but does not commandeer. The distinction is critical. Federal preemption of state law is both permissible and  commonplace, and it does not cross any constitutional line just because it prevents states from achieving their preferred policy objectives. Commandeering, by contrast, is impermissible but arises only when Congress goes beyond precluding state action and affirmatively commands it. … That is a very rare thing.”

That’s the theme of this brief: there is nothing remarkable about PASPA, and Petitioners’ attempts to characterize the law as coercive or requiring “affirmative action” or is fundamentally flawed they write. The Leagues again:

“Indeed, PASPA does not require states to enact, maintain, consider, enforce, or do anything. Instead, the statute sets forth only what states (and private parties) may not do—i.e., take action inconsistent with the federal policy against states sponsored sports-gambling schemes.”

Clement and the Leagues discuss much more in the dense but well-crafted brief, but that’s the ultimate takeaway.

The Next Steps in the New Jersey v. Leagues Sports Betting Case

Petitioners now have 30 days to file a reply brief rebutting the Leagues’ arguments. During this time, the high court allows only seven days for amicus briefs (briefs by “friends of the court”) in support of the League, which in this case may come from anti-gambling groups or other individuals or researchers for whom the court grants permission to file.

The United States Solicitor General, Noel Francisco, who acts as the attorney for the government, may also file a brief in support of Respondents. Because then-acting Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall previously recommended in a brief that the high court not grant Petitioners’ request for a writ of certiorari (a request for the court to hear the case), it’s possible that he declines the opportunity here.

And then the court hears oral arguments by both sides on December 4. Each side will have approximately 30 minutes to make their case, although the nine Supreme Court Justices will certainly interrupt with questions about various aspects of the case and the constitutional questions at issue. Stay tuned.

ShareTweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

atlantic-city-boardwalk
Legislation

New Jersey Lawmakers Latest To Condemn Amount Of Wagering Advertising

March 20, 2023
david rebuck, dan hartman, kevin O'Toole, Robert Williams
Industry

Four States, Four Ways To Look At Changing Sports Betting Advertising

March 7, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 23, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 23, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright © 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...