• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

Supreme Court Sports Betting Case Oral Argument Recap: Christie v NCAA

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
December 4, 2017
in Regulation
supreme court sports betting ban

Outside the Supreme Court

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

WASHINGTON — Before a full house at the Supreme Court of the United States on Monday morning, the high court heard oral argument in Christie v NCAA — aΒ long-percolating clash over a 1992 federal law that effectively bans sports betting outside Nevada.

The State of New Jersey (Christie) and the NCAA (along with the major professional sports leagues) each had high-powered, seasoned attorneys arguing their cases: Ted Olson for New Jersey, claiming that the law known as PASPA (Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act) tramples upon New Jersey’s rights in violation of federalism principles; and for the leagues Paul Clement, a former United States Solicitor General like Olson, arguing that PASPA is a perfectly fine example of federal government regulation that occurs all the time.

All of the Justices appeared interested and engaged, peppering both attorneys with questions exposing weaknesses of their respective cases. The constitutionality of PASPA is at stake and more broadly, whether New Jersey and a host of other states interested in licensing and regulating sports betting — like Nevada does — may soon be able to do so in the absence of PASPA.

Christie v NCAA Oral Argument Recap: New Jersey, Federal and State Laws, Sports Wagering, and PASPA

Olson spoke first for about 25 minutes and immediately underscored one of his main points: the balance of states’ rights and the federal government’s. He referred to the Constitutional Convention when the founders established the U.S. Constitution in response to the β€œfailed confederacy,” in pursuit of a government to find a balance between state and federal government.

Before Olson got too far, Justice Elena Kagan and Justice Sonia Sotomayor wanted Olson to explain how PASPA is different from laws such as federal energy laws, for example, where the federal government β€œpreempts” or sets regulations that states must follow.

β€œSo why is it that telling the states that it can’t license, participate in, authorize, or otherwise involve itself in gambling a strict prohibition of a commercial actor?” Justice Sotomayor asked.

Olson answered and stuck to the theme of β€œcommandeering,” emphasizing that PASPA is unique and unconstitutional because when a federal law regulates states, β€œthe state becomes the citizen.”

Meanwhile Justice Kagan wanted to hear about whether (or not) PASPA requires states to β€œself-enact” laws prohibiting sports betting.

One Justice who appeared warm to Olson and New Jerseys’ case, Justice Anthony Kennedy, openly asked that to avoid a commandeering issue, how should PASPA be interpreted?

Olson advised that Congress must take a responsibility in regulating the activity (sports betting in this case) but that PASPA does not do that: rather it’s an act prohibiting wagering under state law, and also passes a budgetary burden to the states. Justice Breyer noted the lack of a regulatory framework regarding sports betting for state, creating the commandeering problem that Olson argued.

NCAA, NFL and Pro Sports Leagues Take Their Turn

Christie v NCAA, Supreme Court Sports Betting Case Lead Attorneys: Tale of the Tape With Ted Olson and Paul Clement
Olson (L), Clement (R)

Speaking of budgetary burden, that’s one area where the newest member of the court, Justice Neil Gorsuch, took issue with PASPA in questioning Clement.

β€œDoes PASPA make enforcement β€˜cheap’?” Gorsuch asked rhetorically, referring to how the burden might be on the states to handle enforcement, not the federal government.

The conservative bloc of the court was quite active during Clement’s turn, particularly Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito, who seemed troubled with PASPA because of its lack of a regulatory framework (or in other words, PASPA doesn’t β€œpreempt” state law because in effect the law doesn’t tell states what to do to with respect to sports wagering, or how to do it).

β€œPASPA was worded in a particular way for a particular reasos” Clement stated, later adding that Congress thought it better at the time to let states decide what to do within the confines of the prohibition.

Alito struck to the heart of that matter during Clement’s time, stating that Congress, if it had wanted to, could have prohibited sports wagering enterprises (or sportsbooks, or operations) as a whole. But PASPA didn’t do that. β€œWhat policy purpose does PAPSA serve that the former” wouldn’t accomplish? Alito asked.

Clement didn’t have a great answer — claiming that PASPA actually promotes federalism by leaving the states some options — although blame for that goes to Congress in 1992.

The Solicitor General’s Office Steps Up to the Plate

Jeffrey Wall, the Principal Deputy Solicitor General of the United States, spoke on behalf of the federal government, in defense of PASPA.

The main highlight of Wall’s 10 minutes was exploration of what’s become known as New Jersey’s β€œnuclear option,” or a total repeal of its prohibitions on sports wagering. This theoretically would create a Wild Wild West environment with no regulation whatsoever on sports betting.

Wall explained that New Jersey could simply do nothing and leave its laws on the books or totally repeal them (full transcript available here).

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: What if the repeal — what if the repeal is across the board, no exceptions?

WALL: If New Jersey just repeals its prohibitions, we have said we don’t have a Heritage Reporting Corporation

CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Well, is that serious? You have no problem if there’s no prohibition at all and anybody can engage in any kind of gambling they want, a 12-year-old can come into the casino and — you’re not serious about that.

WALL: I — I’m very serious about it, Mr. Chief Justice. The problem that Congress was confronting was state sponsored and sanctioned sports gambling schemes. It didn’t care if I bet with my buddy on the Redskins game or we had an office pool. It wasn’t going after all sports gambling. Β 

Wall said that neither Congress nor the lower courts expected New Jersey to engage in β€œgamesmanship” with its self-styled β€œpartial repeal” that brought the case to this point.

With his five minutes reserved, Olson brought it back to 1787: the Constitutional Convention, state versus federal law. He mentioned political accountability which came up in the briefs, but there was very little discussion at all about β€œEqual Sovereignty,” or the doctrine that all states should be on equal footing (as in, why can Nevada have sports wagering but not New Jersey?).

This all came back to federalism and the issue of β€œcommandeering.” Does PASPA force New Jersey to enforce federal law?

And Justice Kennedy remarked at one point in a fashion that seemed to represent the overarching — but far from prevailing — sentiment of the court.

β€œFederal statutes should address to individuals,” Justice Kennedy noted. β€œNot states.”

 

Odds and Ends:

– Chief Justice Roberts actually gave Ted Olson a couple extra minutes in his reserved time, I think because Justice Sotomayor asked a long-winded question at the start of his reserved time.

– The first 15 people on the line for the public were all paid line-holders, which apparently is the new, niche Uber. Once those people got their tickets, they left and later a bunch of men in suits took their places.

– Before oral argument, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie was sworn in the Supreme Court bar (followed by about 30 more attorneys).

– At one point Justice Breyer appeared to pass a note through Justice Thomas to Justice Roberts, and Breyer smiled and laughed, but Roberts did not seem amused by it.

Share17TweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

Virginia September 2022 revenue report
Industry

Virginia Latest To Set Sports Wagering Revenue Record in September

November 1, 2022
nashville street
Industry

SuperBook Enters Tennessee At Its Own Pace, As Always

May 17, 2022
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...