• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

What Makes Us Bet Longshots? Two Researchers Have A Clue

When longshots are placed next to more reasonable propositions, bettors are more likely to bite

Jeff Edelstein by Jeff Edelstein
July 27, 2022
in Features
black swan

Photo: Shutterstock

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Hitting a longshot is the dream of nearly every recreational sports bettor. How else to explain the popularity of single-game parlays and every other one-in-a-million (not literally, but kinda) bet people lay down?

Well, a pair of researchers — one at the University of Pennsylvania and the other at New York University — recently published a paper that helps explain why even the most level-headed bettors sometimes like hitting β€œplace bet” with a five-digit or more number prefaced by a β€œ+” sign, and the answer lies somewhere in between the fine line of psychology and how we deal with numbers.

In short: Bettors are more likely to bet longshots when the odds are displayed in proximity to other, more reasonable odds. When longshots are displayed all by their lonesome, bettors are less likely to try and shoot the moon.

Green Bean🀌 HR PARLAYπŸ’£πŸ’£ pic.twitter.com/oN6repBBx9

— Long$hoT (@t_longshot) July 27, 2022

β€œIn nearly every betting market, gamblers overvalue the riskiest bets,” write Andrew Meyer of Penn and C. Sean Hundtofte of NYU in the abstract to their paper, The Longshot Bias Is a Context Effect. β€œThis β€˜longshot bias’ is usually explained by a tendency to over-weight low probability events. We offer a novel explanation: Contrast effects enhance the attractiveness of longshots because gambles presented in terms of their payoffs are easier to compare along the payoff dimension than along the probability dimension.

“Our analysis of historical betting odds suggests that contrasts between gamble payoffs can explain the longshot bias. Laboratory experiments confirm those contrast effects and show that the longshot bias disappears when gamblers consider bets in isolation or when winning probabilities are easier to compare.”

In English, please

Meyer and Hundtofte based their findings on numerous previous studies, and even created their own β€œbetting market,” noting how respondents handled betting on the odds that it would rain in 21 different American cities.

Me after putting together my 10-leg NFL Week 1 parlay pic.twitter.com/e93xDUQB6p

— FanDuel Sportsbook (@FDSportsbook) July 26, 2022

And while much of the paper is deep in academic jargon, the researchers’ hypothesis stands out for those who are more familiar with β€œpsst, I like Old Tin Can in the fifth at Saratoga at 50-to-1.”

Their hypothesis predicts three things:

  1. Longshots look more attractive when surrounded by less risky bets.
  2. More longshots are therefore bet when presented in this fashion.
  3. But when actual probabilities — instead of payouts — are expressly presented, gamblers start to shy away from the longshots.

β€œWe find evidence that preferences are determined not only by a bet’s own odds, but by the position of those odds within the distribution of recently observed odds,” the authors note in the paper’s general discussion section.Β 

Furthermore, in the part of their study that deals specifically with horse racing, the authors say, β€œAlthough we expect bettors to value both high potential payoffs and high probabilities of winning, they only seem to compare across races along the payoff dimension. This holds until we make the winning probabilities explicit in our final study, at which point people switch and begin to contrast bets along the probability dimension.”

Of course, in the end, we may not need researchers to delve too deeply into the β€œlongshot bias,” as anyone who’s placed one of these bets knows that the idea of getting a lot for a little is the true draw. That, no matter how many ways it’s sliced and diced by the sci-guys, is probably as old as life itself.

ShareTweetShare
Jeff Edelstein

Jeff Edelstein

Jeff is a veteran journalist, working as a columnist for The Trentonian newspaper in Trenton, NJ for a number of years. He's also an avid sports bettor and DFS player. He can be reached at [email protected]

Related Posts

maine-lighthouse-sunset
Analysis

Will Maine’s Proposed Wagering Regulations Scare Operators Away?

March 16, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...