• About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling
This site contains commercial content
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News
No Result
View All Result
SportsHandle
No Result
View All Result

So How Does This William Hill-FanDuel Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Play Out?

Brett Smiley by Brett Smiley
October 25, 2018
in Industry
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

As you may be aware by now, bookmaker William Hill USΒ (WH) filed a lawsuit this week against FanDuel in New Jersey District Court, alleging copyright infringement, specifically for copying the company’s β€œHow to Bet Guide” for its own guide in print and online.

The examples WH gives in its complaint, if true, are pretty damning.

“We are not litigious people but this is ridiculous,” William Hill CEO Joe Asher said in a statement to ESPN. “If the court finds in our favor, a portion of the proceeds will fund scholarships for creative writing programs at New Jersey universities.”

Through conversations with experienced litigators and attorneys with intellectual property experience, below we attempt to answer:

  1. How exactly does the courtΒ determine what kind of damages William Hill may have suffered?;
  2. How much money might this cost FanDuel?;
  3. What other motivations William Hill might have here.

Said a FanDuel spokesperson: β€œAs a policy, we don’t comment on pending litigation.”

Sportsbook Wars: William Hill Sues FanDuel for Allegedly Copying Its ‘How To Bet’ Manual — at What Cost, and What Else Is Driving This Thing?

sports betting william hill eldorado resorts
The William Hill Race & Sports Book in Monmouth Park in New Jersey

Question (1): How exactly does the courtΒ determine what kind of damages William Hill may have suffered?

In legal terms, this becomes a matter of β€œdamages,” β€œactual” damages, or the actual financial impact on WH, if they can prove the infringement.

There’s also β€œstatutory” damages, sums a court might assess if it determines that the infringement Β was β€œwillful” — which is somewhat open for interpretation.

According to John Stone, a partner with the New Jersey-headquartered law firm DeCotiis (emphasis added): “The Copyright ActΒ permits the plaintiff in an infringement action to recover either statutory damages or ‘actual damages and any additional profits of the infringer.'”

Stone continues in more detail (emphasis added):

(a) It is clear that under Β§ 504(b), β€œ[damages] are awarded to compensate the copyright owner for losses from the infringement, and profits are awarded to prevent the infringer from unfairly benefitting from a wrongful act.”

(b) On the other hand, when the plaintiff in an infringement action seeks to recover statutory damages, courts have the discretion to increase statutory damages in cases of willful infringement and to lower the minimum where the infringement occurred innocently.”

But how does WH establish losses and profits in connection with a “How to Bet” manual? Did FanDuel profit by enabling newbie sports bettors with the manual to make ill-advised parlays? How many bettors read the manual?

I write that in jest, highlighting the difficulty and subjectivity of it. So I speculate that WH would pursue the statutory damages, which are more discretionary.

β€œThe amount of the non-statutory damages is extremely fact sensitive because the defendant may not be able to show that its profit was not attributable to the copyrighted work,” Stone said.

There’s additional layers of complication with non-statutory damages. Adds Martin Schwimmer, a partner at the Westchester, N.Y.-based intellectual property law firm Leason Ellis and publisher of @trademarkblog: β€œIf William Hill distributes the guide for free, and does so for promotional purposes, its damages become somewhat hypothetical, and more difficult to prove.”

He continued: β€œI don’t know if William Hill filed for its copyright application prior to the infringement beginning. If not, it could hamper its ability to obtain statutory damages.”


(2) How much money might this cost FanDuel, in terms of a judgment it might have to pay William Hill?

If we assume that William Hill pursues statutory instead of actual damages, the court could award it up to $150,000 (plus attorney’s fees and costs), according to the law.

That’s if the court finds thatΒ β€œthe infringement was committed willfully.”

What constitutes willfully? Well, a confession or some sort of “smoking gun” would do it, if that were to come out during discovery. I haven’t reviewed the case law on willful infringement, but the examples of copying provided in the complaint show what appears to be several sections literally cut and pasted without alteration.

The law says, β€œNothing in this paragraph limits what may be considered willful infringement under this subsection.”

So, it’s open for interpretation. Here’s an image published by John Brennan of US Bets, and some context he provides for it:

“Sure enough, page 13 of the FanDuel guide has a subsection called ‘Alternate & Reverse Run Lines’ that begins, β€œAlternate & reverse run lines are propositional wagers offered by William Hill on each baseball game”:

Via USBets

β€œI’d like to see what FanDuel says in response to a complaint which alleges pretty specifically that it was caught red-handed,” said attorney Josh Krakowsky, who specializes in business litigation at the Manhattan law firm of Davidoff, Hutcher and Citron.


(3) What other motivations might William Hill have here?

So, this might be what’s really driving the lawsuit and is the most interesting question.

β€œThe damages do not appear to be substantial, but the allegations, if true, have FanDuel dead to rights,” said Krakowsky. β€œThis may be more for optics — that a competitor is not playing fair and William Hill needs to make a point that they will not permit theft of their hard work.”

Schwimmer wonders what else might be going on that we don’t yet know about.

β€œThe infringement is so open-and-shut that I’m wondering if there are important facts not in the complaint — like there was a failed attempt to license, or something like that.”

He also echoed Krakowsky’s sentiment about optics.

β€œI think the PR black eye to FanDuel may be compensation enough for William Hill, especially if it could make the argument that it reflects on FanDuel’s integrity,”Β Schwimmer said.

Also Stone, asked if anything else strikes him about the suit, said if William Hill’s allegations are true, there’s “the potentially brazen nature of the copying, and the potential β€˜value’ of such suits (separate from the actual damages) to deter copying and exert some degree of control of or strength in the market.”


Which brings us to parting shots:

We, Sports Handle, believe this is not about winning $150,000, or roughly the amount that FanDuel ended up paying out in connection with the September ticketing glitch that reached the mainstream media.

Rather it’s an opportunity for William Hill to rub FanDuel’s face in the dirt as they both establish footholds in various regions in this rapidly growing U.S. sports betting market.

William Hill is a juggernaut in the U.K. and has a huge presence in Nevada, but at this point nationally is probably not a very well known brand — yet.

Here they get free publicity in what appears to be a textbook infringement case, and a chance to let this case play and enjoy periodic blips about it on the national radar. Here’s a link to an Associated Press story about the suit.

Bigger picture, will the copying of a manual impact any consumer decisions about which sportsbook to use? Doubtful.

But it’s an interesting subplot forΒ others out there who enjoy some sports betting industry drama.

Share1TweetShare
Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley

Brett Smiley is editor-in-chief and co-founder of Sports Handle, which joined forces with the US Bets team in November 2018. He focuses on the sports betting industry and legislation. He's a recreational sports bettor and DFS player himself, focusing on the NFL. In a past life, Smiley practiced commercial litigation in New York City and previously wrote for FOX Sports and SI.com. He lives in New Jersey with his family.

Related Posts

Arizona January 2023 revenue report
Analysis

Arizona Puts Bow On Record-Setting January For U.S. Sports Wagering

March 27, 2023
atlantic-city-boardwalk
Legislation

New Jersey Lawmakers Latest To Condemn Amount Of Wagering Advertising

March 20, 2023
Load More

Top Stories

taylor mathis

Taylor Mathis Got Sacrificed At The Altar Of Responsible Gambling

March 20, 2023
fanduel baseball wall

Premade Same Game Parlays Are Sucker Bets

March 13, 2023
maginfier-over-small-print

Read The Fine Print: A Proposed Federal Rule Could Change Everything For Indian Gaming

March 6, 2023
roman reigns wwe

Colorado Denies Report Stating That It’s Considering WWE Wagering

March 8, 2023

State Sports Betting Guides

Ohio (U.S. state) flag waving against clear blue sky, close up, isolated with clipping path mask alpha channel transparency, perfect for film, news, composition

Ohio Sports Betting – Where To Play, Bonus Offers And Promo Codes

by Brian Pempus
March 27, 2023

Downtown Detroit at twilight (Shutterstock)

Michigan Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 27, 2023

VA captial

Virginia Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonus Offers

by Brett Smiley
January 17, 2023

nj flag

New Jersey Sports Betting — Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks, And FAQ

by Brett Smiley
March 22, 2023

pa online sportsbooks

Pennsylvania Sports Betting – Where To Play, Online Sportsbooks And Bonuses

by Brett Smiley
October 6, 2022

Canada Sports Betting Guides

Canada Sports Betting – Best Sportsbook Apps & Bonus Offers

British Columbia Sports Betting – Legal Update, Available Sportsbooks, and FAQ

Ontario Sports Betting – Legal Status And Where To Play

SportsHandle

  • Analysis
  • Casino
  • Features
  • Horse Racing
  • Industry
  • Legal
  • Legislation
  • Opinion
  • Podcasts
  • Poker
  • Politics
  • Promotions
  • Regulation
  • Sports
  • Uncategorized

Better Collective

This website is owned and operated by Better Collective USA. Trademarks and copyrights referenced on this website are and shall remain the exclusive property of their respective owners and/or licensors. Please be sure to visit the operator’s website(s) to review their terms & conditions. We advise you to read these carefully as they contain important information. Copyright Β© 2023 USBets.com | Better Collective USA
21 Play Responsibly
Gamble Aware West Virginia
Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-Gambler.
GameSense

Search Sports Handle

No Result
View All Result
  • About Us / Contact
  • Responsible Gambling

No Result
View All Result
  • US Sports Betting
    • Arizona
    • Arkansas
    • Colorado
    • Connecticut
    • Delaware
    • Illinois
    • Indiana
    • Iowa
    • Kansas
    • Louisiana
    • Maine
    • Maryland
    • Massachusetts
    • Michigan
    • Mississippi
    • New Jersey
    • New Mexico
    • New York
    • Ohio
    • Oregon
    • Pennsylvania
    • Tennessee
    • Virginia
    • West Virginia
    • Wyoming
  • Pending States
    • California
    • Florida
    • Georgia
    • Missouri
    • North Carolina
  • Canada
    • Ontario
    • British Columbia
    • Alberta
  • Sportsbook Apps
    • FanDuel
    • BetMGM
    • Caesars
    • PointsBet
    • BetRivers
  • Tools
    • Sportsbook Bonuses Explained
    • Sports Betting Revenue Tracker
    • Sports Betting Podcasts
    • Partnership Tracker
    • Expected Value
    • Sports Scores And Odds Apps
    • Sports Betting Twitter
  • News

loading

Please wait while you are redirected to the right page...